SWBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NAPC Defense has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of -646.04%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5% beat NAPC Defense's return on equity of --.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 54.57%. On the other hand NAPC Defense has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than NAPC Defense, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than NAPC Defense.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAPC Defense has a beta of 3.511, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 251.06%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. NAPC Defense offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. NAPC Defense pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $129.7M, which are larger than NAPC Defense quarterly revenues of $67.5K. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M is higher than NAPC Defense's net income of -$435.9K. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.72x while NAPC Defense's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.88x versus -- for NAPC Defense. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of -82.25%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 54.57%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12352865.88%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Smith & Wesson Brands, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Smith & Wesson Brands.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.435, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 243.524%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $129.7M, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.72x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.88x versus 0.02x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of 18.56%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.86%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 54.57%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.386, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.373%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 63.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $129.7M, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $24.9M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M is lower than Omega Flex's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.72x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 21.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.88x versus 3.78x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of 3.19% compared to Smith & Wesson Brands's net margin of 3.88%. Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.28%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a consensus price target of $15.33, signalling upside risk potential of 54.57%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.88%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Sturm Ruger &, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Sturm Ruger &.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.025, which suggesting that the stock is 2.504% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.170, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83%.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Smith & Wesson Brands pays 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 229.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sturm Ruger &'s is not.

Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues are $129.7M, which are larger than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $122.3M. Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M is lower than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $4.7M. Notably, Smith & Wesson Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.72x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 20.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith & Wesson Brands is 0.88x versus 1.18x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.