OFLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 17.36% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of -82.25%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.26% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30701715.79%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.803% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.746, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 274.628%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Omega Flex pays 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -9.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $27M, which are smaller than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Omega Flex's net income of $4.7M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.34x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 3.08x versus 0.01x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 17.36% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 7.4%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.26% beat Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gorman-Rupp has an analysts' consensus of $53.00 which suggests that it could grow by 49.63%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.803% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.692%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Gorman-Rupp offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Omega Flex pays 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Gorman-Rupp pays out 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $27M, which are smaller than Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues of $163.9M. Omega Flex's net income of $4.7M is lower than Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.34x while Gorman-Rupp's PE ratio is 20.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 3.08x versus 1.40x for Gorman-Rupp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of 17.36% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 1.44%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.26% beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of $13.83 which suggests that it could grow by 45.61%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.803% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.267%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 5.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Omega Flex pays 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $27M, which are smaller than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $115.9M. Omega Flex's net income of $4.7M is higher than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.34x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 14.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 3.08x versus 0.87x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 17.36% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 14.45%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.26% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.52%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $137.63 which suggests that it could grow by 18.55%. Given that Xylem has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Xylem is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.803% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.551%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Omega Flex pays 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 39.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $27M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Omega Flex's net income of $4.7M is lower than Xylem's net income of $326M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.34x while Xylem's PE ratio is 31.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 3.08x versus 3.30x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.