GRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Graham has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 3.38%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08% beat Graham's return on equity of 8.43%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.79%. On the other hand Graham has an analysts' consensus of $52.67 which suggests that it could grow by 41.01%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Gorman-Rupp, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Gorman-Rupp.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.244% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.544%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Graham offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Graham pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gorman-Rupp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $163.9M, which are larger than Graham quarterly revenues of $47M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M is higher than Graham's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.09x while Graham's PE ratio is 45.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.54x versus 2.06x for Graham. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 14.08%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 17.71%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.79%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $28.17 which suggests that it could grow by 8.54%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Mueller Water Products, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Mueller Water Products.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.244% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.304%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $163.9M, which are smaller than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $364.3M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M is lower than Mueller Water Products's net income of $51.3M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.09x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 28.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.54x versus 2.97x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Omega Flex has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 15.29%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.79%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.244% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.472%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 3.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $163.9M, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $23.3M. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M is higher than Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.09x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 19.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.54x versus 3.46x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 8.17%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.53%.

Gorman-Rupp has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 35.79%. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $139.14 which suggests that it could grow by 9.62%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Xylem, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Xylem.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.202, which suggesting that the stock is 20.244% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.061%.

Gorman-Rupp has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.87%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Gorman-Rupp pays 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 39.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues are $163.9M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M is lower than Xylem's net income of $169M. Notably, Gorman-Rupp's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.09x while Xylem's PE ratio is 34.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gorman-Rupp is 1.54x versus 3.60x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.