TRMK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hanmi Financial has a net margin of 31.47% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 28.13%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.34% beat Hanmi Financial's return on equity of 8.91%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $41.45, signalling upside risk potential of 20.11%. On the other hand Hanmi Financial has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.33%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Hanmi Financial, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Hanmi Financial.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.299% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hanmi Financial has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.377%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Hanmi Financial offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Hanmi Financial pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are larger than Hanmi Financial quarterly revenues of $62.8M. Trustmark's net income of $53.6M is higher than Hanmi Financial's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.99x while Hanmi Financial's PE ratio is 10.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.42x versus 2.93x for Hanmi Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regions Financial has a net margin of 31.47% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 27.47%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.34% beat Regions Financial's return on equity of 11.26%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $41.45, signalling upside risk potential of 20.11%. On the other hand Regions Financial has an analysts' consensus of $23.55 which suggests that it could grow by 13.47%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Regions Financial.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.299% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regions Financial has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.226%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Regions Financial offers a yield of 4.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Regions Financial pays out 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are smaller than Regions Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Trustmark's net income of $53.6M is lower than Regions Financial's net income of $490M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.99x while Regions Financial's PE ratio is 9.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.42x versus 2.66x for Regions Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Simmons First National has a net margin of 31.47% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 15.45%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.34% beat Simmons First National's return on equity of 4.18%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $41.45, signalling upside risk potential of 20.11%. On the other hand Simmons First National has an analysts' consensus of $22.40 which suggests that it could grow by 13.33%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Simmons First National, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Simmons First National.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.299% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Simmons First National has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.619%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Simmons First National offers a yield of 4.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Simmons First National pays out 69.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are smaller than Simmons First National quarterly revenues of $209.6M. Trustmark's net income of $53.6M is higher than Simmons First National's net income of $32.4M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.99x while Simmons First National's PE ratio is 16.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.42x versus 3.08x for Simmons First National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valley National Bancorp has a net margin of 31.47% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 22.17%. Trustmark's return on equity of 12.34% beat Valley National Bancorp's return on equity of 5.51%.

Trustmark has a consensus price target of $41.45, signalling upside risk potential of 20.11%. On the other hand Valley National Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $10.44 which suggests that it could grow by 18.96%. Given that Trustmark has higher upside potential than Valley National Bancorp, analysts believe Trustmark is more attractive than Valley National Bancorp.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.627, which suggesting that the stock is 37.299% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valley National Bancorp has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.591%.

Trustmark has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Valley National Bancorp offers a yield of 5.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Trustmark pays 25.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Valley National Bancorp pays out 65.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trustmark quarterly revenues are $170.4M, which are smaller than Valley National Bancorp quarterly revenues of $478.4M. Trustmark's net income of $53.6M is lower than Valley National Bancorp's net income of $106.1M. Notably, Trustmark's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.99x while Valley National Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trustmark is 4.42x versus 2.49x for Valley National Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.