BRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CorVel has a net margin of 19.28% compared to Brown & Brown's net margin of 10.43%. Brown & Brown's return on equity of 16.39% beat CorVel's return on equity of 33.19%.

Brown & Brown has a consensus price target of $117.74, signalling upside risk potential of 0.95%. On the other hand CorVel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brown & Brown has higher upside potential than CorVel, analysts believe Brown & Brown is more attractive than CorVel.

Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.750, which suggesting that the stock is 24.976% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel has a beta of 0.939, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.112%.

Brown & Brown has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. CorVel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brown & Brown pays 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than CorVel quarterly revenues of $228M. Brown & Brown's net income of $210M is higher than CorVel's net income of $23.8M. Notably, Brown & Brown's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.71x while CorVel's PE ratio is 67.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown is 7.11x versus 6.89x for CorVel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingstone Companies has a net margin of 19.28% compared to Brown & Brown's net margin of 12.92%. Brown & Brown's return on equity of 16.39% beat Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 38.66%.

Brown & Brown has a consensus price target of $117.74, signalling upside risk potential of 0.95%. On the other hand Kingstone Companies has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.42%. Given that Kingstone Companies has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, analysts believe Kingstone Companies is more attractive than Brown & Brown.

Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.750, which suggesting that the stock is 24.976% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.481, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.89%.

Brown & Brown has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Kingstone Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brown & Brown pays 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingstone Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brown & Brown's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues of $42.1M. Brown & Brown's net income of $210M is higher than Kingstone Companies's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Brown & Brown's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.71x while Kingstone Companies's PE ratio is 11.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown is 7.11x versus 1.30x for Kingstone Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marsh & McLennan Companies has a net margin of 19.28% compared to Brown & Brown's net margin of 12.99%. Brown & Brown's return on equity of 16.39% beat Marsh & McLennan Companies's return on equity of 30.77%.

Brown & Brown has a consensus price target of $117.74, signalling upside risk potential of 0.95%. On the other hand Marsh & McLennan Companies has an analysts' consensus of $236.85 which suggests that it could grow by 3.18%. Given that Marsh & McLennan Companies has higher upside potential than Brown & Brown, analysts believe Marsh & McLennan Companies is more attractive than Brown & Brown.

Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.750, which suggesting that the stock is 24.976% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marsh & McLennan Companies has a beta of 0.849, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.053%.

Brown & Brown has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Marsh & McLennan Companies offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Brown & Brown pays 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Marsh & McLennan Companies pays out 37.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Marsh & McLennan Companies quarterly revenues of $6.1B. Brown & Brown's net income of $210M is lower than Marsh & McLennan Companies's net income of $788M. Notably, Brown & Brown's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.71x while Marsh & McLennan Companies's PE ratio is 28.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown is 7.11x versus 4.66x for Marsh & McLennan Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 19.28% compared to Brown & Brown's net margin of 15.48%. Brown & Brown's return on equity of 16.39% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01%.

Brown & Brown has a consensus price target of $117.74, signalling upside risk potential of 0.95%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $66.26 which suggests that it could fall by -1.1%. Given that Brown & Brown has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Brown & Brown is more attractive than WR Berkley.

Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.750, which suggesting that the stock is 24.976% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.537%.

Brown & Brown has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Brown & Brown pays 15.51% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brown & Brown quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Brown & Brown's net income of $210M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M. Notably, Brown & Brown's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.71x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 15.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brown & Brown is 7.11x versus 1.97x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.