WRB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CNA Financial has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 7.67%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $67.83, signalling downside risk potential of -5.37%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $45.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.9%. Given that CNA Financial has more downside risk than WR Berkley, analysts believe WR Berkley is more attractive than CNA Financial.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.435, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.528, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.159%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $274M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.63x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 14.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.06x versus 0.92x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 12.58%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $67.83, signalling downside risk potential of -5.37%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $293.8824 which suggests that it could grow by 5.65%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.435, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.748%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.63x while Progressive's PE ratio is 18.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.06x versus 2.08x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RLI has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 15.51%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93% beat RLI's return on equity of 17.61%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $67.83, signalling downside risk potential of -5.37%. On the other hand RLI has an analysts' consensus of $78.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.17%. Given that RLI has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe RLI is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.435, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RLI has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.894%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. RLI offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. RLI pays out 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than RLI quarterly revenues of $407.7M. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is higher than RLI's net income of $63.2M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.63x while RLI's PE ratio is 24.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.06x versus 3.93x for RLI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 3.35%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $67.83, signalling downside risk potential of -5.37%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $276.26 which suggests that it could grow by 5.2%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.435, which suggesting that the stock is 56.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.67%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.8B. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is higher than The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.63x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 14.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.06x versus 1.29x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.