CNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 7.67% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of -3.51%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 10.82%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -5.9%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $152.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.9%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.528, which suggesting that the stock is 47.159% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.386%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.6B. CNA Financial's net income of $274M is higher than Cincinnati Financial's net income of -$90M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.58x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 15.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.92x versus 2.10x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loews has a net margin of 7.67% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.34%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76% beat Loews's return on equity of 7.5%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -5.9%. On the other hand Loews has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -63.37%. Given that Loews has more downside risk than CNA Financial, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than Loews.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.528, which suggesting that the stock is 47.159% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loews has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.494%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Loews offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews pays out 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Loews quarterly revenues of $4.4B. CNA Financial's net income of $274M is lower than Loews's net income of $370M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.58x while Loews's PE ratio is 14.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.92x versus 1.09x for Loews. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 7.67% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 12.58%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -5.9%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $293.8824 which suggests that it could grow by 5.65%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.528, which suggesting that the stock is 47.159% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.748%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. CNA Financial's net income of $274M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.58x while Progressive's PE ratio is 18.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.92x versus 2.08x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 7.67% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 11.84%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 8.76% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.93%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -5.9%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $67.83 which suggests that it could fall by -5.37%. Given that CNA Financial has more downside risk than WR Berkley, analysts believe WR Berkley is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.528, which suggesting that the stock is 47.159% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.435, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.478%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.5B. CNA Financial's net income of $274M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.58x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 16.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.92x versus 2.06x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.