CINF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CNA Financial has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 0.58%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $150.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.19%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could fall by -10.44%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than CNA Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.703%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.32x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 13.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 1.88x versus 0.94x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First American Financial has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 4.69%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat First American Financial's return on equity of 2.67%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $150.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.19%. On the other hand First American Financial has an analysts' consensus of $74.25 which suggests that it could grow by 18.61%. Given that First American Financial has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe First American Financial is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First American Financial has a beta of 1.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.761%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. First American Financial offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. First American Financial pays out 168.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but First American Financial's is not.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than First American Financial quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is higher than First American Financial's net income of $74.2M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.32x while First American Financial's PE ratio is 41.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 1.88x versus 1.04x for First American Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 2.86%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.62%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $150.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.19%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.6%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.188, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.241%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $284.7M. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $8.1M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.32x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 1.88x versus 1.03x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 1.56%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 15.73%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $150.50, signalling upside risk potential of 11.19%. On the other hand Universal Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.43%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.533, which suggesting that the stock is 46.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.271%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Universal Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings pays out 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $384.8M. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is higher than Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $6M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.32x while Universal Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 11.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 1.88x versus 0.45x for Universal Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.