UVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HCI Group has a net margin of 10.49% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings's net margin of 32.1%. Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat HCI Group's return on equity of 28.29%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand HCI Group has an analysts' consensus of $184.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.36%. Given that HCI Group has higher upside potential than Universal Insurance Holdings, analysts believe HCI Group is more attractive than Universal Insurance Holdings.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group has a beta of 1.235, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.542%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. HCI Group offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings pays 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group pays out 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $394.9M, which are larger than HCI Group quarterly revenues of $217.1M. Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $41.4M is lower than HCI Group's net income of $69.7M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.23x while HCI Group's PE ratio is 15.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings is 0.48x versus 2.61x for HCI Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 10.49% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings's net margin of 7.31%. Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.75%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -12.56%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.218, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.16%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings pays 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $394.9M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $299.6M. Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $41.4M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $21.9M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.23x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings is 0.48x versus 1.03x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 10.49% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings's net margin of 8.55%. Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.17 which suggests that it could grow by 8.81%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Selective Insurance Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Selective Insurance Group.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.059%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings pays 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $394.9M, which are smaller than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $41.4M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.23x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 23.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings is 0.48x versus 1.06x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 10.49% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings's net margin of 5.35%. Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 17.07% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.6%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $29.00, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.37%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than United Fire Group.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.082% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.488, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.206%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.49%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings pays 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $394.9M, which are larger than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $331.1M. Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $41.4M is higher than United Fire Group's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.23x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 11.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings is 0.48x versus 0.56x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.