SAFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 2.86% compared to Safety Insurance Group's net margin of 15.96%. Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.62% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56%.

Safety Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -8.5%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $150.50 which suggests that it could grow by 12.57%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.188, which suggesting that the stock is 81.241% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.533, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.747%.

Safety Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. Safety Insurance Group pays 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $284.7M, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Safety Insurance Group's net income of $8.1M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M. Notably, Safety Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 9.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safety Insurance Group is 1.02x versus 1.86x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donegal Group has a net margin of 2.86% compared to Safety Insurance Group's net margin of 9.6%. Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.62% beat Donegal Group's return on equity of 10.14%.

Safety Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -8.5%. On the other hand Donegal Group has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.84%. Given that Safety Insurance Group has more downside risk than Donegal Group, analysts believe Donegal Group is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.188, which suggesting that the stock is 81.241% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donegal Group has a beta of -0.051, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.133%.

Safety Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. Donegal Group offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Safety Insurance Group pays 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Donegal Group pays out 44.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $284.7M, which are larger than Donegal Group quarterly revenues of $250M. Safety Insurance Group's net income of $8.1M is lower than Donegal Group's net income of $24M. Notably, Safety Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Donegal Group's PE ratio is 12.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safety Insurance Group is 1.02x versus 0.65x for Donegal Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 2.86% compared to Safety Insurance Group's net margin of 8.55%. Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.62% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.57%.

Safety Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -8.5%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.2%. Given that Selective Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Selective Insurance Group is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.188, which suggesting that the stock is 81.241% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.451, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.87%.

Safety Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Safety Insurance Group pays 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $284.7M, which are smaller than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Safety Insurance Group's net income of $8.1M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $109.9M. Notably, Safety Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 23.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safety Insurance Group is 1.02x versus 1.08x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 2.86% compared to Safety Insurance Group's net margin of 9.48%. Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.62% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23%.

Safety Insurance Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -8.5%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.21%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.188, which suggesting that the stock is 81.241% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.329, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.136%.

Safety Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.71%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Safety Insurance Group pays 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $284.7M, which are smaller than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $331.7M. Safety Insurance Group's net income of $8.1M is lower than United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M. Notably, Safety Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 11.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safety Insurance Group is 1.02x versus 0.57x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.