PGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Progressive's net margin of 24.7%. Progressive's return on equity of 36.88% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $277.7647, signalling upside risk potential of 17.89%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $156.33 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Progressive has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.864% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.544%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Progressive pays 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $19.7B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Progressive's net income of $2.3B is higher than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.12x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 6.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 1.92x versus 1.76x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Progressive's net margin of 9.69%. Progressive's return on equity of 36.88% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 288.18%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $277.7647, signalling upside risk potential of 17.89%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance has an analysts' consensus of $110.10 which suggests that it could grow by 11.68%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance.

Progressive has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.864% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.058%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. Goosehead Insurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Progressive pays 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance pays out 77.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $19.7B, which are larger than Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues of $78M. Progressive's net income of $2.3B is higher than Goosehead Insurance's net income of $7.6M. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.12x while Goosehead Insurance's PE ratio is 136.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 1.92x versus 12.15x for Goosehead Insurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Progressive's net margin of 10.59%. Progressive's return on equity of 36.88% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $277.7647, signalling upside risk potential of 17.89%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $264.29 which suggests that it could grow by 13.71%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Progressive has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.864% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.647, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.297%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Progressive pays 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $19.7B, which are larger than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Progressive's net income of $2.3B is higher than The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.12x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 11.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 1.92x versus 1.19x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Progressive's net margin of 10.83%. Progressive's return on equity of 36.88% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53%.

Progressive has a consensus price target of $277.7647, signalling upside risk potential of 17.89%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $64.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.88%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than WR Berkley.

Progressive has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.864% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.214%.

Progressive has a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Progressive pays 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Progressive quarterly revenues are $19.7B, which are larger than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Progressive's net income of $2.3B is higher than WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M. Notably, Progressive's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.12x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 14.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Progressive is 1.92x versus 1.74x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.