ALL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mercury General has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Allstate's net margin of 7.4%. Allstate's return on equity of 24.09% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $224.29, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.6%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Allstate, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Allstate.

Allstate has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.838% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.499%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. Mercury General offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Allstate pays 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Allstate's net income of $1.9B is higher than Mercury General's net income of $101.1M. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.47x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 6.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.81x versus 0.55x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Allstate's net margin of 12.58%. Allstate's return on equity of 24.09% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $224.29, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $291.9412 which suggests that it could grow by 10.09%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Progressive.

Allstate has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.838% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.975%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Allstate pays 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Allstate's net income of $1.9B is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.47x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.81x versus 1.98x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Allstate's net margin of 3.35%. Allstate's return on equity of 24.09% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $224.29, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $276.41 which suggests that it could grow by 6.15%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Allstate has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.838% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.825%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Allstate pays 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.8B. Allstate's net income of $1.9B is higher than The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.47x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 14.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.81x versus 1.28x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Allstate's net margin of 11.84%. Allstate's return on equity of 24.09% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.94%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $224.29, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $67.43 which suggests that it could fall by -6.02%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than WR Berkley.

Allstate has a beta of 0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 63.838% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.537%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Allstate pays 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.5B, which are larger than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Allstate's net income of $1.9B is higher than WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.47x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 16.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.81x versus 2.07x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.