TRV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 10.59% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 7.16%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55% beat Allstate's return on equity of 23.5%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $264.29, signalling upside risk potential of 13.71%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $224.53 which suggests that it could grow by 24.06%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.647, which suggesting that the stock is 35.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.975%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Allstate offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.6B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B is higher than Allstate's net income of $1.2B. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.92x while Allstate's PE ratio is 11.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.19x versus 0.77x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First American Financial has a net margin of 10.59% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of -7.4%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55% beat First American Financial's return on equity of 1.92%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $264.29, signalling upside risk potential of 13.71%. On the other hand First American Financial has an analysts' consensus of $75.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.98%. Given that First American Financial has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe First American Financial is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.647, which suggesting that the stock is 35.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First American Financial has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.107%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. First American Financial offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. First American Financial pays out 99.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than First American Financial quarterly revenues of $1.4B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B is higher than First American Financial's net income of -$104M. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.92x while First American Financial's PE ratio is 64.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.19x versus 1.02x for First American Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury General has a net margin of 10.59% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 15.09%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 34.73%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $264.29, signalling upside risk potential of 13.71%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.51%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.647, which suggesting that the stock is 35.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.654%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Mercury General offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.5B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B is higher than Mercury General's net income of $230.9M. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.92x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 4.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.19x versus 0.49x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 10.59% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 11.84%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55% beat Progressive's return on equity of 36.88%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $264.29, signalling upside risk potential of 13.71%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $277.7647 which suggests that it could grow by 17.89%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.647, which suggesting that the stock is 35.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.411, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.864%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Progressive offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $19.7B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.3B. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.92x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.19x versus 1.92x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.