CRS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 12.42% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of -25.36%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 16.84% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $247.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.46%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $193.04 which suggests that it could grow by 23.37%. Given that Carpenter Technology has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe Carpenter Technology is more attractive than Boeing.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.285, which suggesting that the stock is 28.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.238, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.789%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $676.9M, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $15.2B. Carpenter Technology's net income of $84.1M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$3.9B. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 3.03x versus 1.52x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blue Bird has a net margin of 12.42% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 9.15%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 16.84% beat Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $247.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.46%. On the other hand Blue Bird has an analysts' consensus of $53.00 which suggests that it could grow by 59.4%. Given that Blue Bird has higher upside potential than Carpenter Technology, analysts believe Blue Bird is more attractive than Carpenter Technology.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.285, which suggesting that the stock is 28.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Bird has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.709%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Blue Bird offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Bird pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $676.9M, which are larger than Blue Bird quarterly revenues of $313.9M. Carpenter Technology's net income of $84.1M is higher than Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while Blue Bird's PE ratio is 10.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 3.03x versus 0.83x for Blue Bird. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Industries has a net margin of 12.42% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of 14.91%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 16.84% beat Mueller Industries's return on equity of 23.46%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $247.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.46%. On the other hand Mueller Industries has an analysts' consensus of $105.00 which suggests that it could grow by 48.05%. Given that Mueller Industries has higher upside potential than Carpenter Technology, analysts believe Mueller Industries is more attractive than Carpenter Technology.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.285, which suggesting that the stock is 28.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Industries has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.588%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Mueller Industries offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Industries pays out 14.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $676.9M, which are smaller than Mueller Industries quarterly revenues of $923.5M. Carpenter Technology's net income of $84.1M is lower than Mueller Industries's net income of $137.7M. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while Mueller Industries's PE ratio is 13.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 3.03x versus 2.14x for Mueller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 12.42% compared to Carpenter Technology's net margin of -0.33%. Carpenter Technology's return on equity of 16.84% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.43%.

Carpenter Technology has a consensus price target of $247.00, signalling upside risk potential of 43.46%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $44.33 which suggests that it could grow by 32.74%. Given that Carpenter Technology has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe Carpenter Technology is more attractive than Proto Labs.

Carpenter Technology has a beta of 1.285, which suggesting that the stock is 28.466% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.383%.

Carpenter Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.47%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carpenter Technology pays 21.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carpenter Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carpenter Technology quarterly revenues are $676.9M, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $121.8M. Carpenter Technology's net income of $84.1M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of -$404K. Notably, Carpenter Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 51.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carpenter Technology is 3.03x versus 1.68x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.