ELF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coty has a net margin of 4.86% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 1.42%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 14.23% beat Coty's return on equity of 0.3%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $93.36, signalling upside risk potential of 67.49%. On the other hand Coty has an analysts' consensus of $8.27 which suggests that it could grow by 54.26%. Given that e.l.f. Beauty has higher upside potential than Coty, analysts believe e.l.f. Beauty is more attractive than Coty.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.415, which suggesting that the stock is 41.538% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coty has a beta of 1.747, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.729%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coty pays out 14.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Coty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $355.3M, which are smaller than Coty quarterly revenues of $1.7B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $17.3M is lower than Coty's net income of $23.7M. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.98x while Coty's PE ratio is 38.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 2.50x versus 0.77x for Coty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dollar Tree has a net margin of 4.86% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 73.9%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 14.23% beat Dollar Tree's return on equity of -45.07%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $93.36, signalling upside risk potential of 67.49%. On the other hand Dollar Tree has an analysts' consensus of $83.71 which suggests that it could grow by 15.34%. Given that e.l.f. Beauty has higher upside potential than Dollar Tree, analysts believe e.l.f. Beauty is more attractive than Dollar Tree.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.415, which suggesting that the stock is 41.538% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dollar Tree has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.242%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dollar Tree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dollar Tree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $355.3M, which are larger than Dollar Tree quarterly revenues of -$5B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $17.3M is higher than Dollar Tree's net income of -$3.7B. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.98x while Dollar Tree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 2.50x versus 0.89x for Dollar Tree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pricesmart has a net margin of 4.86% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 2.98%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 14.23% beat Pricesmart's return on equity of 12.45%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $93.36, signalling upside risk potential of 67.49%. On the other hand Pricesmart has an analysts' consensus of $99.33 which suggests that it could grow by 15.79%. Given that e.l.f. Beauty has higher upside potential than Pricesmart, analysts believe e.l.f. Beauty is more attractive than Pricesmart.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.415, which suggesting that the stock is 41.538% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pricesmart has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.255%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pricesmart offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pricesmart pays out 47.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Pricesmart's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $355.3M, which are smaller than Pricesmart quarterly revenues of $1.3B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $17.3M is lower than Pricesmart's net income of $37.4M. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.98x while Pricesmart's PE ratio is 18.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 2.50x versus 0.51x for Pricesmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Target has a net margin of 4.86% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 3.57%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 14.23% beat Target's return on equity of 28.87%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $93.36, signalling upside risk potential of 67.49%. On the other hand Target has an analysts' consensus of $133.97 which suggests that it could grow by 37.14%. Given that e.l.f. Beauty has higher upside potential than Target, analysts believe e.l.f. Beauty is more attractive than Target.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.415, which suggesting that the stock is 41.538% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Target has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.118%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Target offers a yield of 4.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.12 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Target pays out 50.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Target's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $355.3M, which are smaller than Target quarterly revenues of $30.9B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $17.3M is lower than Target's net income of $1.1B. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.98x while Target's PE ratio is 11.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 2.50x versus 0.42x for Target. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.