EQNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Eni SpA has a net margin of 8.98% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 2.53%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 20% beat Eni SpA's return on equity of 4.67%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $29.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.51%. On the other hand Eni SpA has an analysts' consensus of $32.62 which suggests that it could grow by 15.58%. Given that Eni SpA has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe Eni SpA is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.847, which suggesting that the stock is 15.298% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eni SpA has a beta of 0.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.446%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Eni SpA offers a yield of 7.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Equinor ASA pays 91.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Eni SpA pays out 63.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $25.4B, which are larger than Eni SpA quarterly revenues of $22.7B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.3B is higher than Eni SpA's net income of $574.1M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.93x while Eni SpA's PE ratio is 16.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.71x versus 0.47x for Eni SpA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TechnipFMC PLC has a net margin of 8.98% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 11.69%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 20% beat TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 21.46%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $29.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.51%. On the other hand TechnipFMC PLC has an analysts' consensus of $32.65 which suggests that it could grow by 3.79%. Given that Equinor ASA has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC PLC, analysts believe Equinor ASA is more attractive than TechnipFMC PLC.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.847, which suggesting that the stock is 15.298% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.571, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.059%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. TechnipFMC PLC offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Equinor ASA pays 91.76% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC pays out 77.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $25.4B, which are larger than TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.3B is higher than TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $274.6M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.93x while TechnipFMC PLC's PE ratio is 21.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.71x versus 1.62x for TechnipFMC PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nine Energy Service has a net margin of 8.98% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of -7.34%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 20% beat Nine Energy Service's return on equity of --.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $29.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.51%. On the other hand Nine Energy Service has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could fall by -24.24%. Given that Equinor ASA has higher upside potential than Nine Energy Service, analysts believe Equinor ASA is more attractive than Nine Energy Service.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.847, which suggesting that the stock is 15.298% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.536, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 253.637%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Nine Energy Service offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Equinor ASA pays 91.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Nine Energy Service pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Equinor ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $25.4B, which are larger than Nine Energy Service quarterly revenues of $138.2M. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.3B is higher than Nine Energy Service's net income of -$10.1M. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.93x while Nine Energy Service's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.71x versus 0.08x for Nine Energy Service. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shell PLC has a net margin of 8.98% compared to Equinor ASA's net margin of 6.04%. Equinor ASA's return on equity of 20% beat Shell PLC's return on equity of 8.26%.

Equinor ASA has a consensus price target of $29.60, signalling upside risk potential of 14.51%. On the other hand Shell PLC has an analysts' consensus of $79.94 which suggests that it could grow by 21.25%. Given that Shell PLC has higher upside potential than Equinor ASA, analysts believe Shell PLC is more attractive than Equinor ASA.

Equinor ASA has a beta of 0.847, which suggesting that the stock is 15.298% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shell PLC has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.48%.

Equinor ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.22%. Shell PLC offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Equinor ASA pays 91.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Shell PLC pays out 43.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinor ASA quarterly revenues are $25.4B, which are smaller than Shell PLC quarterly revenues of $71.1B. Equinor ASA's net income of $2.3B is lower than Shell PLC's net income of $4.3B. Notably, Equinor ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.93x while Shell PLC's PE ratio is 13.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinor ASA is 0.71x versus 0.73x for Shell PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.