SM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Archrock has a net margin of 21.71% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 18.31%. SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29% beat Archrock's return on equity of 16.37%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $38.43, signalling upside risk potential of 78.57%. On the other hand Archrock has an analysts' consensus of $30.88 which suggests that it could grow by 29.08%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Archrock, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Archrock.

SM Energy has a beta of 2.173, which suggesting that the stock is 117.291% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Archrock has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.266%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Archrock offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. SM Energy pays 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Archrock pays out 64.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $839.6M, which are larger than Archrock quarterly revenues of $326.4M. SM Energy's net income of $182.3M is higher than Archrock's net income of $59.8M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.01x while Archrock's PE ratio is 23.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 0.84x versus 3.35x for Archrock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 21.71% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 34.86%. SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $38.43, signalling upside risk potential of 78.57%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $183.46 which suggests that it could grow by 39%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

SM Energy has a beta of 2.173, which suggesting that the stock is 117.291% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.263%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. SM Energy pays 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $839.6M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. SM Energy's net income of $182.3M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.01x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 0.84x versus 2.48x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Range Resources has a net margin of 21.71% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 11.47%. SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29% beat Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $38.43, signalling upside risk potential of 78.57%. On the other hand Range Resources has an analysts' consensus of $39.90 which suggests that it could grow by 13.91%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Range Resources.

SM Energy has a beta of 2.173, which suggesting that the stock is 117.291% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Resources has a beta of 0.597, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.255%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Range Resources offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. SM Energy pays 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources pays out 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $839.6M, which are smaller than Range Resources quarterly revenues of $846.3M. SM Energy's net income of $182.3M is higher than Range Resources's net income of $97.1M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.01x while Range Resources's PE ratio is 31.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 0.84x versus 3.27x for Range Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 21.71% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 9.52%. SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 12.7%.

SM Energy has a consensus price target of $38.43, signalling upside risk potential of 78.57%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $123.74 which suggests that it could grow by 19.86%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

SM Energy has a beta of 2.173, which suggesting that the stock is 117.291% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.105%.

SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. SM Energy pays 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SM Energy quarterly revenues are $839.6M, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. SM Energy's net income of $182.3M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.7B. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.01x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 0.84x versus 1.33x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.