RRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EOG Resources has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 25.04%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 20.78%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $39.90, signalling upside risk potential of 11.4%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $135.47 which suggests that it could grow by 25.47%. Given that EOG Resources has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe EOG Resources is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 0.597, which suggesting that the stock is 40.255% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 0.782, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.762%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 32.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $846.3M, which are smaller than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Range Resources's net income of $97.1M is lower than EOG Resources's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.98x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 10.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.35x versus 2.60x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expand Energy has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Range Resources's net margin of -11.34%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98% beat Expand Energy's return on equity of -7.49%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $39.90, signalling upside risk potential of 11.4%. On the other hand Expand Energy has an analysts' consensus of $124.04 which suggests that it could grow by 12.45%. Given that Expand Energy has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Expand Energy is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 0.597, which suggesting that the stock is 40.255% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Expand Energy offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Expand Energy pays out -54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $846.3M, which are smaller than Expand Energy quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Range Resources's net income of $97.1M is higher than Expand Energy's net income of -$249M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.98x while Expand Energy's PE ratio is 63.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.35x versus 3.77x for Expand Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 23.86%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 18.13%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $39.90, signalling upside risk potential of 11.4%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $63.53 which suggests that it could grow by 58.67%. Given that Matador Resources has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Matador Resources is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 0.597, which suggesting that the stock is 40.255% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.147%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $846.3M, which are smaller than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $1B. Range Resources's net income of $97.1M is lower than Matador Resources's net income of $240.1M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.98x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 5.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.35x versus 1.36x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 21.71%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $39.90, signalling upside risk potential of 11.4%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $38.43 which suggests that it could grow by 81.27%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 0.597, which suggesting that the stock is 40.255% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 2.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.291%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. SM Energy offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $846.3M, which are larger than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $839.6M. Range Resources's net income of $97.1M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $182.3M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.98x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 2.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.35x versus 0.83x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.