FI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HubSpot has a net margin of 16.59% compared to Fiserv's net margin of 0.71%. Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52% beat HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $227.42, signalling upside risk potential of 22.6%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $750.28 which suggests that it could grow by 17.34%. Given that Fiserv has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Fiserv is more attractive than HubSpot.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 3.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.785, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.528%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $703.2M. Fiserv's net income of $851M is higher than HubSpot's net income of $5M. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while HubSpot's PE ratio is 7,104.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 5.15x versus 12.68x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paymentus Holdings has a net margin of 16.59% compared to Fiserv's net margin of 5.1%. Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52% beat Paymentus Holdings's return on equity of 9.71%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $227.42, signalling upside risk potential of 22.6%. On the other hand Paymentus Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $31.00 which suggests that it could fall by -9.17%. Given that Fiserv has higher upside potential than Paymentus Holdings, analysts believe Fiserv is more attractive than Paymentus Holdings.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 3.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paymentus Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paymentus Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paymentus Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Paymentus Holdings quarterly revenues of $257.9M. Fiserv's net income of $851M is higher than Paymentus Holdings's net income of $13.1M. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while Paymentus Holdings's PE ratio is 100.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 5.15x versus 5.00x for Paymentus Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toast has a net margin of 16.59% compared to Fiserv's net margin of 2.39%. Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52% beat Toast's return on equity of 1.43%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $227.42, signalling upside risk potential of 22.6%. On the other hand Toast has an analysts' consensus of $40.96 which suggests that it could grow by 14.28%. Given that Fiserv has higher upside potential than Toast, analysts believe Fiserv is more attractive than Toast.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 3.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toast has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Toast offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Toast pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Toast quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Fiserv's net income of $851M is higher than Toast's net income of $32M. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while Toast's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 5.15x versus 4.37x for Toast. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 16.59% compared to Fiserv's net margin of -1.23%. Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $227.42, signalling upside risk potential of 22.6%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 27.7%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Fiserv, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Fiserv.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.970, which suggesting that the stock is 3.044% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.475%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Fiserv's net income of $851M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 5.15x versus 0.33x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.