GBTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expedia Group has a net margin of -2.71% compared to Global Business Travel Group's net margin of 9.39%. Global Business Travel Group's return on equity of -11.97% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71%.

Global Business Travel Group has a consensus price target of $9.35, signalling upside risk potential of 56.88%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $199.33 which suggests that it could grow by 19.68%. Given that Global Business Travel Group has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Global Business Travel Group is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Global Business Travel Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.619, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.927%.

Global Business Travel Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Global Business Travel Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Business Travel Group quarterly revenues are $591M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Global Business Travel Group's net income of -$16M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $299M. Notably, Global Business Travel Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 18.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Business Travel Group is 1.14x versus 1.66x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspirato has a net margin of -2.71% compared to Global Business Travel Group's net margin of -3.62%. Global Business Travel Group's return on equity of -11.97% beat Inspirato's return on equity of --.

Global Business Travel Group has a consensus price target of $9.35, signalling upside risk potential of 56.88%. On the other hand Inspirato has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 233.33%. Given that Inspirato has higher upside potential than Global Business Travel Group, analysts believe Inspirato is more attractive than Global Business Travel Group.

Global Business Travel Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspirato has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Business Travel Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspirato offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Business Travel Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspirato pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Business Travel Group quarterly revenues are $591M, which are larger than Inspirato quarterly revenues of $63.1M. Global Business Travel Group's net income of -$16M is lower than Inspirato's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Global Business Travel Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspirato's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Business Travel Group is 1.14x versus 0.08x for Inspirato. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of -2.71% compared to Global Business Travel Group's net margin of -16.86%. Global Business Travel Group's return on equity of -11.97% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Global Business Travel Group has a consensus price target of $9.35, signalling upside risk potential of 56.88%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 55.76%. Given that Global Business Travel Group has higher upside potential than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, analysts believe Global Business Travel Group is more attractive than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings.

Global Business Travel Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.650, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.981%.

Global Business Travel Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Business Travel Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Business Travel Group quarterly revenues are $591M, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $148.6M. Global Business Travel Group's net income of -$16M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of -$25M. Notably, Global Business Travel Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Business Travel Group is 1.14x versus 0.84x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.