EXPE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amazon.com has a net margin of 9.39% compared to Expedia Group's net margin of 10.65%. Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71% beat Amazon.com's return on equity of 24.69%.

Expedia Group has a consensus price target of $212.54, signalling upside risk potential of 39.49%. On the other hand Amazon.com has an analysts' consensus of $263.99 which suggests that it could grow by 47.97%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Expedia Group has a beta of 1.653, which suggesting that the stock is 65.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amazon.com has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.882%.

Expedia Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Amazon.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Expedia Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amazon.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Expedia Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Amazon.com quarterly revenues of $187.8B. Expedia Group's net income of $299M is lower than Amazon.com's net income of $20B. Notably, Expedia Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Amazon.com's PE ratio is 32.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expedia Group is 1.52x versus 3.00x for Amazon.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Booking Holdings has a net margin of 9.39% compared to Expedia Group's net margin of 19.52%. Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71% beat Booking Holdings's return on equity of --.

Expedia Group has a consensus price target of $212.54, signalling upside risk potential of 39.49%. On the other hand Booking Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5,636.98 which suggests that it could grow by 26.66%. Given that Expedia Group has higher upside potential than Booking Holdings, analysts believe Expedia Group is more attractive than Booking Holdings.

Expedia Group has a beta of 1.653, which suggesting that the stock is 65.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Booking Holdings has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.823%.

Expedia Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Booking Holdings offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $9.60 per share. Expedia Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Booking Holdings pays out 19.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Booking Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Expedia Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Booking Holdings quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Expedia Group's net income of $299M is lower than Booking Holdings's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Expedia Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Booking Holdings's PE ratio is 25.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expedia Group is 1.52x versus 6.39x for Booking Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 9.39% compared to Expedia Group's net margin of -16.86%. Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Expedia Group has a consensus price target of $212.54, signalling upside risk potential of 39.49%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.33 which suggests that it could grow by 78.3%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Expedia Group has a beta of 1.653, which suggesting that the stock is 65.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.867, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 186.735%.

Expedia Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Expedia Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Expedia Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $148.6M. Expedia Group's net income of $299M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of -$25M. Notably, Expedia Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expedia Group is 1.52x versus 0.75x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vacasa has a net margin of 9.39% compared to Expedia Group's net margin of -30.52%. Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71% beat Vacasa's return on equity of -90.12%.

Expedia Group has a consensus price target of $212.54, signalling upside risk potential of 39.49%. On the other hand Vacasa has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could fall by -53.7%. Given that Expedia Group has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Expedia Group is more attractive than Vacasa.

Expedia Group has a beta of 1.653, which suggesting that the stock is 65.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Expedia Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Vacasa offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Expedia Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vacasa pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Expedia Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Vacasa quarterly revenues of $138M. Expedia Group's net income of $299M is higher than Vacasa's net income of -$42.1M. Notably, Expedia Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.84x while Vacasa's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Expedia Group is 1.52x versus 0.09x for Vacasa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.