AMZN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Etsy has a net margin of 9.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 8.66%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 22.73% beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $239.92, signalling upside risk potential of 5.87%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $62.33 which suggests that it could grow by 15.78%. Given that Etsy has higher upside potential than Amazon.com, analysts believe Etsy is more attractive than Amazon.com.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 1.991, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.148%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $158.9B, which are larger than Etsy quarterly revenues of $662.4M. Amazon.com's net income of $15.3B is higher than Etsy's net income of $57.4M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.62x while Etsy's PE ratio is 27.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.91x versus 2.58x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 9.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of -125.86%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 22.73% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $239.92, signalling upside risk potential of 5.87%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $15.03 which suggests that it could grow by 7.08%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Amazon.com, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Amazon.com.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $158.9B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. Amazon.com's net income of $15.3B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.62x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.91x versus 3.05x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starbucks has a net margin of 9.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 10.02%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 22.73% beat Starbucks's return on equity of --.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $239.92, signalling upside risk potential of 5.87%. On the other hand Starbucks has an analysts' consensus of $103.30 which suggests that it could grow by 12.46%. Given that Starbucks has higher upside potential than Amazon.com, analysts believe Starbucks is more attractive than Amazon.com.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starbucks has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.863%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Starbucks offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks pays out 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $158.9B, which are larger than Starbucks quarterly revenues of $9.1B. Amazon.com's net income of $15.3B is higher than Starbucks's net income of $909.2M. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.62x while Starbucks's PE ratio is 27.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.91x versus 2.89x for Starbucks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 9.65% compared to Amazon.com's net margin of 8.61%. Amazon.com's return on equity of 22.73% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Amazon.com has a consensus price target of $239.92, signalling upside risk potential of 5.87%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -37.49%. Given that Amazon.com has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Amazon.com is more attractive than Tesla.

Amazon.com has a beta of 1.161, which suggesting that the stock is 16.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Amazon.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amazon.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Amazon.com quarterly revenues are $158.9B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Amazon.com's net income of $15.3B is higher than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Amazon.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.62x while Tesla's PE ratio is 124.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amazon.com is 3.91x versus 16.31x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.