ML Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Inuvo has a net margin of -2.06% compared to MoneyLion's net margin of -9.14%. MoneyLion's return on equity of 1.2% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

MoneyLion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.19%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 141.24%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than MoneyLion, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than MoneyLion.

MoneyLion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

MoneyLion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MoneyLion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MoneyLion quarterly revenues are $135.5M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. MoneyLion's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, MoneyLion's price-to-earnings ratio is 309.43x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MoneyLion is 1.96x versus 0.70x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -2.06% compared to MoneyLion's net margin of -6.7%. MoneyLion's return on equity of 1.2% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

MoneyLion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.19%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 44.77%. Given that Issuer Direct has higher upside potential than MoneyLion, analysts believe Issuer Direct is more attractive than MoneyLion.

MoneyLion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

MoneyLion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MoneyLion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MoneyLion quarterly revenues are $135.5M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. MoneyLion's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, MoneyLion's price-to-earnings ratio is 309.43x while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 57.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MoneyLion is 1.96x versus 1.18x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -2.06% compared to MoneyLion's net margin of 37.61%. MoneyLion's return on equity of 1.2% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

MoneyLion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.19%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.76%. Given that MoneyLion has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe MoneyLion is more attractive than Microsoft.

MoneyLion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

MoneyLion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. MoneyLion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MoneyLion quarterly revenues are $135.5M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. MoneyLion's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, MoneyLion's price-to-earnings ratio is 309.43x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MoneyLion is 1.96x versus 12.91x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -2.06% compared to MoneyLion's net margin of 22.41%. MoneyLion's return on equity of 1.2% beat Oracle's return on equity of 128.3%.

MoneyLion has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 21.19%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $196.55 which suggests that it could grow by 14.67%. Given that MoneyLion has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe MoneyLion is more attractive than Oracle.

MoneyLion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.029, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.915%.

MoneyLion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. MoneyLion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MoneyLion quarterly revenues are $135.5M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. MoneyLion's net income of -$2.8M is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.2B. Notably, MoneyLion's price-to-earnings ratio is 309.43x while Oracle's PE ratio is 41.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MoneyLion is 1.96x versus 8.87x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.