ORCL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

C3.ai has a net margin of 22.41% compared to Oracle's net margin of -69.93%. Oracle's return on equity of 128.3% beat C3.ai's return on equity of -31.06%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $196.55, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand C3.ai has an analysts' consensus of $36.15 which suggests that it could grow by 1.96%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than C3.ai, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than C3.ai.

Oracle has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.915% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison C3.ai has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. C3.ai offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. C3.ai pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than C3.ai quarterly revenues of $94.3M. Oracle's net income of $3.2B is higher than C3.ai's net income of -$66M. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.35x while C3.ai's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 8.75x versus 12.69x for C3.ai. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Salesforce has a net margin of 22.41% compared to Oracle's net margin of 16.17%. Oracle's return on equity of 128.3% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.11%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $196.55, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $394.98 which suggests that it could grow by 15.41%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Salesforce, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Salesforce.

Oracle has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.915% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.388%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Oracle's net income of $3.2B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.35x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 56.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 8.75x versus 9.00x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 22.41% compared to Oracle's net margin of 37.61%. Oracle's return on equity of 128.3% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $196.55, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $508.55 which suggests that it could grow by 16.84%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Oracle.

Oracle has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.915% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Oracle's net income of $3.2B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.35x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 35.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 8.75x versus 12.79x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of 22.41% compared to Oracle's net margin of -34.42%. Oracle's return on equity of 128.3% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -25.9%.

Oracle has a consensus price target of $196.55, signalling upside risk potential of 16.21%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $184.12 which suggests that it could grow by 14.05%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Snowflake.

Oracle has a beta of 1.029, which suggesting that the stock is 2.915% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oracle has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oracle pays 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oracle quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $942.1M. Oracle's net income of $3.2B is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$324.3M. Notably, Oracle's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.35x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oracle is 8.75x versus 15.73x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.