ASAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DocuSign has a net margin of -31.18% compared to Asana's net margin of 8.27%. Asana's return on equity of -84.67% beat DocuSign's return on equity of 70.42%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $16.63, signalling downside risk potential of -11.77%. On the other hand DocuSign has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.13%. Given that DocuSign has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe DocuSign is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DocuSign has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.009%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DocuSign offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DocuSign pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Asana quarterly revenues are $183.9M, which are smaller than DocuSign quarterly revenues of $754.8M. Asana's net income of -$57.3M is lower than DocuSign's net income of $62.4M. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DocuSign's PE ratio is 19.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 6.92x versus 6.89x for DocuSign. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit has a net margin of -31.18% compared to Asana's net margin of 6%. Asana's return on equity of -84.67% beat Intuit's return on equity of 16.36%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $16.63, signalling downside risk potential of -11.77%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $728.08 which suggests that it could grow by 14.07%. Given that Intuit has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Intuit is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.516%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asana quarterly revenues are $183.9M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Asana's net income of -$57.3M is lower than Intuit's net income of $197M. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intuit's PE ratio is 61.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 6.92x versus 10.92x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smartsheet has a net margin of -31.18% compared to Asana's net margin of 0.46%. Asana's return on equity of -84.67% beat Smartsheet's return on equity of -1.36%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $16.63, signalling downside risk potential of -11.77%. On the other hand Smartsheet has an analysts' consensus of $53.49 which suggests that it could grow by 0.92%. Given that Smartsheet has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Smartsheet is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smartsheet has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.444%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smartsheet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smartsheet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Asana quarterly revenues are $183.9M, which are smaller than Smartsheet quarterly revenues of $286.9M. Asana's net income of -$57.3M is lower than Smartsheet's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Smartsheet's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 6.92x versus 7.20x for Smartsheet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of -31.18% compared to Asana's net margin of -34.42%. Asana's return on equity of -84.67% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -25.9%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $16.63, signalling downside risk potential of -11.77%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $184.12 which suggests that it could grow by 14.05%. Given that Snowflake has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Snowflake is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Asana quarterly revenues are $183.9M, which are smaller than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $942.1M. Asana's net income of -$57.3M is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$324.3M. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 6.92x versus 15.73x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.