ASAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of -33.08% compared to Asana's net margin of 17.09%. Asana's return on equity of -90.94% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $15.63, signalling downside risk potential of -3.87%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $373.49 which suggests that it could grow by 40.85%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.885%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asana quarterly revenues are $188.3M, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Asana's net income of -$62.3M is lower than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Salesforce's PE ratio is 41.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 5.15x versus 6.81x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -33.08% compared to Asana's net margin of 34.62%. Asana's return on equity of -90.94% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $15.63, signalling downside risk potential of -3.87%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $500.63 which suggests that it could grow by 28.21%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29399999999999%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asana quarterly revenues are $188.3M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Asana's net income of -$62.3M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 31.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 5.15x versus 11.14x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -33.08% compared to Asana's net margin of 20.78%. Asana's return on equity of -90.94% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $15.63, signalling downside risk potential of -3.87%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $184.26 which suggests that it could grow by 31.91%. Given that Oracle has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Oracle is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.513%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Asana quarterly revenues are $188.3M, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Asana's net income of -$62.3M is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oracle's PE ratio is 32.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 5.15x versus 7.15x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of -33.08% compared to Asana's net margin of 4.25%. Asana's return on equity of -90.94% beat Workday's return on equity of 6.23%.

Asana has a consensus price target of $15.63, signalling downside risk potential of -3.87%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $309.98 which suggests that it could grow by 33.95%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than Asana, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than Asana.

Asana has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.323, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.275%.

Asana has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Asana pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Asana quarterly revenues are $188.3M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Asana's net income of -$62.3M is lower than Workday's net income of $94M. Notably, Asana's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workday's PE ratio is 118.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Asana is 5.15x versus 7.38x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.