TDG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ducommun has a net margin of 21.41% compared to TransDigm Group's net margin of 5.04%. TransDigm Group's return on equity of -- beat Ducommun's return on equity of 4.61%.

TransDigm Group has a consensus price target of $1,492.82, signalling upside risk potential of 18.28%. On the other hand Ducommun has an analysts' consensus of $82.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.17%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than TransDigm Group, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than TransDigm Group.

TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.439% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ducommun has a beta of 1.416, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.586%.

TransDigm Group has a quarterly dividend of $75.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ducommun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TransDigm Group pays 118.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Ducommun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TransDigm Group quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Ducommun quarterly revenues of $201.4M. TransDigm Group's net income of $468M is higher than Ducommun's net income of $10.1M. Notably, TransDigm Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while Ducommun's PE ratio is 32.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TransDigm Group is 9.19x versus 1.23x for Ducommun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 21.41% compared to TransDigm Group's net margin of 9.49%. TransDigm Group's return on equity of -- beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37%.

TransDigm Group has a consensus price target of $1,492.82, signalling upside risk potential of 18.28%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $573.31 which suggests that it could grow by 22.49%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than TransDigm Group, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than TransDigm Group.

TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.439% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.791%.

TransDigm Group has a quarterly dividend of $75.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. TransDigm Group pays 118.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but TransDigm Group's is not.

TransDigm Group quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $17.1B. TransDigm Group's net income of $468M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B. Notably, TransDigm Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 16.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TransDigm Group is 9.19x versus 1.58x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 21.41% compared to TransDigm Group's net margin of 7.33%. TransDigm Group's return on equity of -- beat RTX's return on equity of 7.41%.

TransDigm Group has a consensus price target of $1,492.82, signalling upside risk potential of 18.28%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $135.78 which suggests that it could grow by 17.96%. Given that TransDigm Group has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe TransDigm Group is more attractive than RTX.

TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.439% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.837, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.306%.

TransDigm Group has a quarterly dividend of $75.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RTX offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. TransDigm Group pays 118.9% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TransDigm Group quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.1B. TransDigm Group's net income of $468M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, TransDigm Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while RTX's PE ratio is 32.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TransDigm Group is 9.19x versus 1.95x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Textron has a net margin of 21.41% compared to TransDigm Group's net margin of 6.51%. TransDigm Group's return on equity of -- beat Textron's return on equity of 12.66%.

TransDigm Group has a consensus price target of $1,492.82, signalling upside risk potential of 18.28%. On the other hand Textron has an analysts' consensus of $95.24 which suggests that it could grow by 25.89%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than TransDigm Group, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than TransDigm Group.

TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.384, which suggesting that the stock is 38.439% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Textron has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.963%.

TransDigm Group has a quarterly dividend of $75.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Textron offers a yield of 0.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. TransDigm Group pays 118.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Textron pays out 1.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Textron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but TransDigm Group's is not.

TransDigm Group quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Textron quarterly revenues of $3.4B. TransDigm Group's net income of $468M is higher than Textron's net income of $223M. Notably, TransDigm Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.30x while Textron's PE ratio is 16.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TransDigm Group is 9.19x versus 1.05x for Textron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.