UAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nike has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 9.41%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Nike's return on equity of 34.51%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 32.19%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $86.48 which suggests that it could grow by 15.85%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Nike.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.037% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.318%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is lower than Nike's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Nike's PE ratio is 23.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.67x versus 2.30x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -125.86%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 32.19%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $15.03 which suggests that it could grow by 10.7%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.037% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.67x versus 2.95x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 8.57%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.02%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 32.19%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $234.97 which suggests that it could grow by 1.19%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.037% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.502, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.24%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is higher than Ralph Lauren's net income of $147.9M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 22.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.67x versus 2.24x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 8.61%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 32.19%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -31.99%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Tesla.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.037% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Tesla's PE ratio is 114.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.67x versus 14.99x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.