VFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hanesbrands has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of -1.62%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Hanesbrands's return on equity of -159.37%.

VF has a consensus price target of $25.77, signalling upside risk potential of 121.53%. On the other hand Hanesbrands has an analysts' consensus of $7.76 which suggests that it could grow by 57.67%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Hanesbrands, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Hanesbrands.

VF has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.125% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.549, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.884%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Hanesbrands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Hanesbrands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Hanesbrands quarterly revenues of $796.7M. VF's net income of $167.8M is higher than Hanesbrands's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hanesbrands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.44x versus 0.45x for Hanesbrands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of 13.88%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

VF has a consensus price target of $25.77, signalling upside risk potential of 121.53%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $292.48 which suggests that it could grow by 47.8%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

VF has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.125% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.826%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. VF's net income of $167.8M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 18.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.44x versus 1.83x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of 0.09%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29%.

VF has a consensus price target of $25.77, signalling upside risk potential of 121.53%. On the other hand Under Armour has an analysts' consensus of $9.60 which suggests that it could grow by 81.81%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Under Armour.

VF has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.125% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.386%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Under Armour offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Under Armour quarterly revenues of $1.4B. VF's net income of $167.8M is higher than Under Armour's net income of $1.2M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Under Armour's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.44x versus 0.44x for Under Armour. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of 4.97%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of 16.59%.

VF has a consensus price target of $25.77, signalling upside risk potential of 121.53%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of $22.56 which suggests that it could grow by 105.84%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Wolverine World Wide, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Wolverine World Wide.

VF has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.125% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.751%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out 67.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $494.7M. VF's net income of $167.8M is higher than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $24.6M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is 20.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.44x versus 0.51x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.