CICHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bank Of China has a net margin of 43.85% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of 33.02%. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 9.97% beat Bank Of China's return on equity of 8.21%.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bank Of China has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank has higher upside potential than Bank Of China, analysts believe China Construction Bank is more attractive than Bank Of China.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.012, which suggesting that the stock is 98.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bank Of China has a beta of 0.165, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.511%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.67%. Bank Of China offers a yield of 11.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. China Construction Bank pays 40.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Bank Of China pays out 49.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $26.1B, which are larger than Bank Of China quarterly revenues of $22.6B. China Construction Bank's net income of $11.5B is higher than Bank Of China's net income of $7.5B. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.69x while Bank Of China's PE ratio is 5.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 2.11x versus 2.03x for Bank Of China. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bank of Communications has a net margin of 43.85% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of 38.32%. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 9.97% beat Bank of Communications's return on equity of 8.2%.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bank of Communications has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank has higher upside potential than Bank of Communications, analysts believe China Construction Bank is more attractive than Bank of Communications.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.012, which suggesting that the stock is 98.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bank of Communications has a beta of -0.354, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.391%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.67%. Bank of Communications offers a yield of 11.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. China Construction Bank pays 40.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Bank of Communications pays out 55.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $26.1B, which are larger than Bank of Communications quarterly revenues of $9.1B. China Construction Bank's net income of $11.5B is higher than Bank of Communications's net income of $3.5B. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.69x while Bank of Communications's PE ratio is 5.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 2.11x versus 2.03x for Bank of Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 43.85% compared to China Construction Bank's net margin of --. China Construction Bank's return on equity of 9.97% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.

China Construction Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Construction Bank has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe China Construction Bank is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.

China Construction Bank has a beta of 0.012, which suggesting that the stock is 98.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

China Construction Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.67%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Construction Bank pays 40.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Construction Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Construction Bank quarterly revenues are $26.1B, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Construction Bank's net income of $11.5B is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Construction Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.69x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Construction Bank is 2.11x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.