GFMH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cineverse has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net margin of 17.46%. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Cineverse's return on equity of -35.17%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cineverse has an analysts' consensus of $8.50 which suggests that it could grow by 183.33%. Given that Cineverse has higher upside potential than Goliath Film & Media Holdings, analysts believe Cineverse is more attractive than Goliath Film & Media Holdings.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cineverse has a beta of 1.620, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.974%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cineverse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goliath Film & Media Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cineverse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings quarterly revenues are $32.7K, which are smaller than Cineverse quarterly revenues of $40.7M. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net income of -$8K is lower than Cineverse's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Goliath Film & Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.40x while Cineverse's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goliath Film & Media Holdings is -- versus 0.65x for Cineverse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaia has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net margin of -3.29%. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Gaia's return on equity of -5.72%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gaia has an analysts' consensus of $8.38 which suggests that it could grow by 82.07%. Given that Gaia has higher upside potential than Goliath Film & Media Holdings, analysts believe Gaia is more attractive than Goliath Film & Media Holdings.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaia has a beta of 1.001, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.085000000000002%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gaia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goliath Film & Media Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gaia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings quarterly revenues are $32.7K, which are smaller than Gaia quarterly revenues of $24.4M. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net income of -$8K is higher than Gaia's net income of -$803K. Notably, Goliath Film & Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.40x while Gaia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goliath Film & Media Holdings is -- versus 1.19x for Gaia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net margin of -2.81%. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -32.18%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $12.75 which suggests that it could grow by 11.54%. Given that Paramount Global has higher upside potential than Goliath Film & Media Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Global is more attractive than Goliath Film & Media Holdings.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.314, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.369%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Goliath Film & Media Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings quarterly revenues are $32.7K, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $8B. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net income of -$8K is higher than Paramount Global's net income of -$224M. Notably, Goliath Film & Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.40x while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goliath Film & Media Holdings is -- versus 0.26x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TKO Group Holdings has a net margin of 25.08% compared to Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net margin of 4.83%. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's return on equity of -- beat TKO Group Holdings's return on equity of 0.11%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TKO Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $169.76 which suggests that it could grow by 9.33%. Given that TKO Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Goliath Film & Media Holdings, analysts believe TKO Group Holdings is more attractive than Goliath Film & Media Holdings.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a beta of 0.835, which suggesting that the stock is 16.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TKO Group Holdings has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.049%.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TKO Group Holdings offers a yield of 0.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Goliath Film & Media Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TKO Group Holdings pays out 714.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

Goliath Film & Media Holdings quarterly revenues are $32.7K, which are smaller than TKO Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $642.2M. Goliath Film & Media Holdings's net income of -$8K is lower than TKO Group Holdings's net income of $31M. Notably, Goliath Film & Media Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.40x while TKO Group Holdings's PE ratio is 7,764.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goliath Film & Media Holdings is -- versus 5.77x for TKO Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.