HTHIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kubota has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of 6.75%. Hitachi's return on equity of 11.45% beat Kubota's return on equity of 9.86%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 57.1%. On the other hand Kubota has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.06%. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than Kubota, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than Kubota.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kubota has a beta of 0.952, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.753%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Kubota offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Kubota pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Kubota quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than Kubota's net income of $317.2M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while Kubota's PE ratio is 8.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.36x versus 0.61x for Kubota. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyocera has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of -3.6%. Hitachi's return on equity of 11.45% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 1.45%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 57.1%. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.40 which suggests that it could grow by 2.8%. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than Kyocera, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than Kyocera.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.222, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.775%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 49.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.36x versus 1.15x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LogProstyle has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of --. Hitachi's return on equity of 11.45% beat LogProstyle's return on equity of --.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 57.1%. On the other hand LogProstyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hitachi has higher upside potential than LogProstyle, analysts believe Hitachi is more attractive than LogProstyle.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LogProstyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. LogProstyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. LogProstyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hitachi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than LogProstyle quarterly revenues of --. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than LogProstyle's net income of --. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while LogProstyle's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.36x versus -- for LogProstyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Hitachi's net margin of 5.34%. Hitachi's return on equity of 11.45% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

Hitachi has a consensus price target of $30.67, signalling upside risk potential of 57.1%. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 82.37%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Hitachi, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than Hitachi.

Hitachi has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hitachi has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hitachi pays 24.47% of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hitachi's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hitachi quarterly revenues are $16.2B, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. Hitachi's net income of $908.1M is higher than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Hitachi's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 7.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hitachi is 1.36x versus 1.54x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.