Why Did Bill Ackman Buy Uber Stock?
In February, Pershing Square manager Bill Ackman revealed that his…
Sell
38
IAUFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.23
Seasonality move
:
5.74%
Day range:
$0.22 - $0.22
52-week range:
$0.14 - $0.41
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
14.12x
P/S ratio:
1.02x
P/B ratio:
0.89x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
735
1-year change:
-9.24%
Market cap:
$126.7M
Revenue:
$119.6M
EPS (TTM):
$0.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAUFF
AIC Mines
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $51.90 |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAUFF
AIC Mines
|
$0.22 | -- | $126.7M | 14.12x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.02x |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
$49.31 | $51.90 | $125.1B | 11.00x | $1.00 | 5.03% | 2.34x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.14x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
$0.06 | -- | $17.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.98x |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
$12.82 | -- | $67.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
$0.09 | -- | $31.3M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 227.45% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAUFF
AIC Mines
|
10.79% | 0.810 | 17.99% | 2.38x |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
30.73% | 0.473 | 15.79% | 1.21x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate
|
9.38% | -0.990 | 6.83% | 1.16x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
38.76% | -0.085 | 18.45% | 0.44x |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -1.371 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAUFF
AIC Mines
|
-- | -- | 6.29% | 6.71% | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | 16.7% | 23.67% | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
-- | -- | -33.72% | -45.85% | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
AIC Mines vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IAUFF or BHP?
BHP Group has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines's net margin of --. AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71% beat BHP Group's return on equity of 23.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAUFFAIC Mines-- -- $159.7M BHPBHP Group-- -- $69.8B -
What do Analysts Say About IAUFF or BHP?
AIC Mines has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BHP Group has an analysts' consensus of $51.90 which suggests that it could grow by 5.25%. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than AIC Mines, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than AIC Mines.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAUFFAIC Mines0 0 0 BHPBHP Group3 3 0 -
Is IAUFF or BHP More Risky?
AIC Mines has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BHP Group has a beta of 0.864, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.595%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAUFF or BHP?
AIC Mines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BHP Group offers a yield of 5.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. AIC Mines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group pays out 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAUFF or BHP?
AIC Mines quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BHP Group quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines's net income of -- is lower than BHP Group's net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while BHP Group's PE ratio is 11.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines is 1.02x versus 2.34x for BHP Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAUFFAIC Mines1.02x 14.12x -- -- BHPBHP Group2.34x 11.00x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IAUFF or FTZZF?
Canadian Phosphate has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines's net margin of --. AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71% beat Canadian Phosphate's return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAUFFAIC Mines-- -- $159.7M FTZZFCanadian Phosphate-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About IAUFF or FTZZF?
AIC Mines has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canadian Phosphate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIC Mines has higher upside potential than Canadian Phosphate, analysts believe AIC Mines is more attractive than Canadian Phosphate.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAUFFAIC Mines0 0 0 FTZZFCanadian Phosphate0 0 0 -
Is IAUFF or FTZZF More Risky?
AIC Mines has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Phosphate has a beta of -0.660, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 166.02%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAUFF or FTZZF?
AIC Mines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Phosphate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIC Mines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Phosphate pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAUFF or FTZZF?
AIC Mines quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canadian Phosphate quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines's net income of -- is lower than Canadian Phosphate's net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Canadian Phosphate's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines is 1.02x versus 1.14x for Canadian Phosphate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAUFFAIC Mines1.02x 14.12x -- -- FTZZFCanadian Phosphate1.14x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IAUFF or HMIFF?
Harvest Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines's net margin of --. AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71% beat Harvest Minerals's return on equity of -45.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAUFFAIC Mines-- -- $159.7M HMIFFHarvest Minerals-- -- $5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IAUFF or HMIFF?
AIC Mines has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIC Mines has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals, analysts believe AIC Mines is more attractive than Harvest Minerals.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAUFFAIC Mines0 0 0 HMIFFHarvest Minerals0 0 0 -
Is IAUFF or HMIFF More Risky?
AIC Mines has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAUFF or HMIFF?
AIC Mines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvest Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIC Mines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAUFF or HMIFF?
AIC Mines quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines's net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals's net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Harvest Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines is 1.02x versus 4.98x for Harvest Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAUFFAIC Mines1.02x 14.12x -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals4.98x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IAUFF or NVA?
Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines's net margin of --. AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71% beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAUFFAIC Mines-- -- $159.7M NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IAUFF or NVA?
AIC Mines has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 95.01%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than AIC Mines, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than AIC Mines.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAUFFAIC Mines0 0 0 NVANova Minerals0 0 0 -
Is IAUFF or NVA More Risky?
AIC Mines has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAUFF or NVA?
AIC Mines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AIC Mines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAUFF or NVA?
AIC Mines quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines is 1.02x versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAUFFAIC Mines1.02x 14.12x -- -- NVANova Minerals-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IAUFF or SBMSF?
Danakali has a net margin of -- compared to AIC Mines's net margin of --. AIC Mines's return on equity of 6.71% beat Danakali's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IAUFFAIC Mines-- -- $159.7M SBMSFDanakali-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IAUFF or SBMSF?
AIC Mines has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AIC Mines has higher upside potential than Danakali, analysts believe AIC Mines is more attractive than Danakali.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IAUFFAIC Mines0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali0 0 0 -
Is IAUFF or SBMSF More Risky?
AIC Mines has a beta of 0.531, which suggesting that the stock is 46.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.483%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAUFF or SBMSF?
AIC Mines has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danakali offers a yield of 227.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. AIC Mines pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAUFF or SBMSF?
AIC Mines quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali quarterly revenues of --. AIC Mines's net income of -- is lower than Danakali's net income of --. Notably, AIC Mines's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.12x while Danakali's PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AIC Mines is 1.02x versus -- for Danakali. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IAUFFAIC Mines1.02x 14.12x -- -- SBMSFDanakali-- 47.38x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Should You Buy Alibaba Stock Despite the Risks?
Markets rebounded slightly after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a…
Why Is Intel Struggling Against AMD?
Due to its disappointing reports, so-so management, and lack of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.6T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
48
FI alert for Apr 25
Fiserv [FI] is up 0.33% over the past day.
Buy
66
FARO alert for Apr 25
Faro Technologies [FARO] is up 0.93% over the past day.
Buy
55
PI alert for Apr 25
Impinj [PI] is up 2.15% over the past day.
