BWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dorman Products has a net margin of 6.79% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 10.97%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 14.58% beat Dorman Products's return on equity of 15.73%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 28.16%. On the other hand Dorman Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.54%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Dorman Products, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Dorman Products.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.357% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorman Products has a beta of 0.875, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.519%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Dorman Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 20.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Dorman Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Dorman Products quarterly revenues of $503.8M. BorgWarner's net income of $234M is higher than Dorman Products's net income of $55.3M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.17x while Dorman Products's PE ratio is 22.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.52x versus 2.09x for Dorman Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 6.79% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of --. BorgWarner's return on equity of 14.58% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 28.16%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -27.54%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.357% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.489%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 20.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. BorgWarner's net income of $234M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.17x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.52x versus 276.79x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lear has a net margin of 6.79% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 2.43%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 14.58% beat Lear's return on equity of 10.99%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 28.16%. On the other hand Lear has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.4%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.357% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lear has a beta of 1.448, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.755%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Lear offers a yield of 3.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. BorgWarner pays 20.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear pays out 31.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Lear quarterly revenues of $5.6B. BorgWarner's net income of $234M is higher than Lear's net income of $135.8M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.17x while Lear's PE ratio is 10.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.52x versus 0.23x for Lear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Modine Manufacturing has a net margin of 6.79% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 7.01%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 14.58% beat Modine Manufacturing's return on equity of 21.37%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 28.16%. On the other hand Modine Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of $147.35 which suggests that it could grow by 24.27%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Modine Manufacturing, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Modine Manufacturing.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.194, which suggesting that the stock is 19.357% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Modine Manufacturing has a beta of 2.308, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.781%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Modine Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 20.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Modine Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Modine Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $658M. BorgWarner's net income of $234M is higher than Modine Manufacturing's net income of $46.1M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.17x while Modine Manufacturing's PE ratio is 38.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.52x versus 2.57x for Modine Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.