LEA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Lear's net margin of -6.21%. Lear's return on equity of 10.36% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.57%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $115.68, signalling upside risk potential of 49.51%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $58.85 which suggests that it could grow by 34.87%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than General Motors.

Lear has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.509%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $47.7B. Lear's net income of $88.1M is higher than General Motors's net income of -$3B. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.65x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.19x versus 0.26x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentex has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Lear's net margin of 16.19%. Lear's return on equity of 10.36% beat Gentex's return on equity of 16.88%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $115.68, signalling upside risk potential of 49.51%. On the other hand Gentex has an analysts' consensus of $30.51 which suggests that it could grow by 44.12%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Gentex, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Gentex.

Lear has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentex has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.567%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Gentex offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex pays out 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Gentex quarterly revenues of $541.6M. Lear's net income of $88.1M is higher than Gentex's net income of $87.7M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.65x while Gentex's PE ratio is 12.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.19x versus 2.08x for Gentex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strattec Security has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Lear's net margin of 1.02%. Lear's return on equity of 10.36% beat Strattec Security's return on equity of 7.22%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $115.68, signalling upside risk potential of 49.51%. On the other hand Strattec Security has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.21%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Strattec Security, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Strattec Security.

Lear has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strattec Security has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.215%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Strattec Security offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Strattec Security pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Strattec Security quarterly revenues of $129.9M. Lear's net income of $88.1M is higher than Strattec Security's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.65x while Strattec Security's PE ratio is 8.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.19x versus 0.26x for Strattec Security. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Lear's net margin of 12.99%. Lear's return on equity of 10.36% beat Visteon's return on equity of 22.69%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $115.68, signalling upside risk potential of 49.51%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $99.23 which suggests that it could grow by 45.69%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Visteon.

Lear has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.364%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Visteon quarterly revenues of $939M. Lear's net income of $88.1M is lower than Visteon's net income of $122M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.65x while Visteon's PE ratio is 6.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.19x versus 0.49x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.