VC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BorgWarner has a net margin of 12.99% compared to Visteon's net margin of -11.78%. Visteon's return on equity of 22.69% beat BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $92.08, signalling upside risk potential of 16.24%. On the other hand BorgWarner has an analysts' consensus of $35.76 which suggests that it could grow by 25.77%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.364% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BorgWarner has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.919%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BorgWarner offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner pays out 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $939M, which are smaller than BorgWarner quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Visteon's net income of $122M is higher than BorgWarner's net income of -$405M. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.95x while BorgWarner's PE ratio is 19.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.56x versus 0.45x for BorgWarner. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ford Motor has a net margin of 12.99% compared to Visteon's net margin of 3.78%. Visteon's return on equity of 22.69% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 13.45%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $92.08, signalling upside risk potential of 16.24%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $9.82 which suggests that it could fall by -2.35%. Given that Visteon has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe Visteon is more attractive than Ford Motor.

Visteon has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.364% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.414, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.387%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 7.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $939M, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $48.2B. Visteon's net income of $122M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.95x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 6.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.56x versus 0.22x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of 12.99% compared to Visteon's net margin of -6.21%. Visteon's return on equity of 22.69% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.57%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $92.08, signalling upside risk potential of 16.24%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $55.74 which suggests that it could grow by 18.91%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.364% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.509%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $939M, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $47.7B. Visteon's net income of $122M is higher than General Motors's net income of -$3B. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.95x while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.56x versus 0.28x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lear has a net margin of 12.99% compared to Visteon's net margin of 1.54%. Visteon's return on equity of 22.69% beat Lear's return on equity of 10.36%.

Visteon has a consensus price target of $92.08, signalling upside risk potential of 16.24%. On the other hand Lear has an analysts' consensus of $105.15 which suggests that it could grow by 23.14%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Visteon.

Visteon has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.364% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lear has a beta of 1.344, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.377%.

Visteon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lear offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Visteon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear pays out 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Visteon quarterly revenues are $939M, which are smaller than Lear quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Visteon's net income of $122M is higher than Lear's net income of $88.1M. Notably, Visteon's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.95x while Lear's PE ratio is 9.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Visteon is 0.56x versus 0.21x for Lear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.