CHD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 15% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 14.05%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.43% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 450.97%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of $99.60, signalling upside risk potential of 8.27%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $98.77 which suggests that it could grow by 8.68%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.550, which suggesting that the stock is 45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.394, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.596%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Church & Dwight pays 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Church & Dwight's net income of $220.1M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $690M. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.48x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 25.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 3.74x versus 3.74x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a net margin of 15% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 4.48%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.43% beat The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -17.08%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of $99.60, signalling upside risk potential of 8.27%. On the other hand The Estee Lauder Companies has an analysts' consensus of $68.20 which suggests that it could grow by 15.09%. Given that The Estee Lauder Companies has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe The Estee Lauder Companies is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.550, which suggesting that the stock is 45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.118, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.764%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. The Estee Lauder Companies offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Church & Dwight pays 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. The Estee Lauder Companies pays out 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Church & Dwight's net income of $220.1M is higher than The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of $159M. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.48x while The Estee Lauder Companies's PE ratio is 124.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 3.74x versus 1.45x for The Estee Lauder Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 15% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 19.06%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.43% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of $99.60, signalling upside risk potential of 8.27%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $171.51 which suggests that it could grow by 7.67%. Given that Church & Dwight has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Church & Dwight is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.550, which suggesting that the stock is 45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.603%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Church & Dwight pays 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. Church & Dwight's net income of $220.1M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.48x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 25.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 3.74x versus 4.67x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 15% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 3.36%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.43% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of $99.60, signalling upside risk potential of 8.27%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $92.38 which suggests that it could grow by 49.28%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.550, which suggesting that the stock is 45% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.39100000000001%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Church & Dwight pays 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $700.2M. Church & Dwight's net income of $220.1M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.48x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 15.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 3.74x versus 0.60x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.