PG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 18.21% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 14.64%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 28.65% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 434.96%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $180.42, signalling upside risk potential of 11.3%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $103.19 which suggests that it could grow by 17.98%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.437, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.297%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 76.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.7B, which are larger than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $5B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4B is higher than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $737M. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 25.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.77x versus 3.59x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clorox has a net margin of 18.21% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 5.62%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 28.65% beat Clorox's return on equity of 135.23%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $180.42, signalling upside risk potential of 11.3%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $164.57 which suggests that it could grow by 2.45%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Clorox.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.421, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.895%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.7B, which are larger than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4B is higher than Clorox's net income of $99M. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Clorox's PE ratio is 55.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.77x versus 2.68x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 18.21% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 24.03%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 28.65% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $180.42, signalling upside risk potential of 11.3%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $73.30 which suggests that it could grow by 18.78%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.608, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.176%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.7B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4B is higher than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.77x versus 5.75x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walmart has a net margin of 18.21% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 2.7%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 28.65% beat Walmart's return on equity of 21.87%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $180.42, signalling upside risk potential of 11.3%. On the other hand Walmart has an analysts' consensus of $98.5876 which suggests that it could grow by 7.39%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Walmart, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Walmart.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.626% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walmart has a beta of 0.549, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.142%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Walmart offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart pays out 39.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.7B, which are smaller than Walmart quarterly revenues of $169.6B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4B is lower than Walmart's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.95x while Walmart's PE ratio is 37.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.77x versus 1.10x for Walmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.