KMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 14.94%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $144.99, signalling upside risk potential of 3.79%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $97.54 which suggests that it could grow by 4.34%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.376, which suggesting that the stock is 62.423% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.402, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.762%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.50x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 26.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.35x versus 3.83x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Honest has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of -0.81%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79% beat The Honest's return on equity of -4.47%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $144.99, signalling upside risk potential of 3.79%. On the other hand The Honest has an analysts' consensus of $7.42 which suggests that it could grow by 67.8%. Given that The Honest has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe The Honest is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.376, which suggesting that the stock is 62.423% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Honest has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. The Honest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. The Honest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than The Honest quarterly revenues of $99.8M. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M is higher than The Honest's net income of -$810K. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.50x while The Honest's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.35x versus 1.18x for The Honest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 21.16%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $144.99, signalling upside risk potential of 3.79%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $176.69 which suggests that it could grow by 6.31%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.376, which suggesting that the stock is 62.423% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.448%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.50x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 26.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.35x versus 4.87x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Turner Valley Oil & Gas has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of --. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79% beat Turner Valley Oil & Gas's return on equity of --.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $144.99, signalling upside risk potential of 3.79%. On the other hand Turner Valley Oil & Gas has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than Turner Valley Oil & Gas, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than Turner Valley Oil & Gas.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.376, which suggesting that the stock is 62.423% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Turner Valley Oil & Gas has a beta of -33.570, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3457.017%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Turner Valley Oil & Gas offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Turner Valley Oil & Gas pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Turner Valley Oil & Gas quarterly revenues of --. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M is higher than Turner Valley Oil & Gas's net income of --. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.50x while Turner Valley Oil & Gas's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.35x versus -- for Turner Valley Oil & Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.