EQT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of 10.01% compared to EQT's net margin of 7.59%. EQT's return on equity of 1.86% beat Chevron's return on equity of 11.12%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $56.69, signalling upside risk potential of 5.06%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $165.36 which suggests that it could grow by 21.78%. Given that Chevron has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Chevron is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.684%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $46.1B. EQT's net income of $242.1M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.5B. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 94.67x while Chevron's PE ratio is 15.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 4.74x versus 1.26x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 10.01% compared to EQT's net margin of 11.1%. EQT's return on equity of 1.86% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 20.2%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $56.69, signalling upside risk potential of 5.06%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $43.21 which suggests that it could grow by 42.66%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.298%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.5B. EQT's net income of $242.1M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $494M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 94.67x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 6.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 4.74x versus 1.15x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expand Energy has a net margin of 10.01% compared to EQT's net margin of -11.34%. EQT's return on equity of 1.86% beat Expand Energy's return on equity of -7.49%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $56.69, signalling upside risk potential of 5.06%. On the other hand Expand Energy has an analysts' consensus of $124.04 which suggests that it could grow by 12.45%. Given that Expand Energy has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Expand Energy is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Expand Energy offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Expand Energy pays out -54.34% of its earnings as a dividend.

EQT quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Expand Energy quarterly revenues of $2.2B. EQT's net income of $242.1M is higher than Expand Energy's net income of -$249M. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 94.67x while Expand Energy's PE ratio is 63.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 4.74x versus 3.77x for Expand Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 10.01% compared to EQT's net margin of 34.86%. EQT's return on equity of 1.86% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

EQT has a consensus price target of $56.69, signalling upside risk potential of 5.06%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $183.26 which suggests that it could grow by 41.44%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than EQT, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than EQT.

EQT has a beta of 0.588, which suggesting that the stock is 41.172% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.263%.

EQT has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. EQT pays 141.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but EQT's is not.

EQT quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. EQT's net income of $242.1M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, EQT's price-to-earnings ratio is 94.67x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 7.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EQT is 4.74x versus 2.44x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.