PH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flowserve has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 5.15%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.38%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $738.41, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $65.20 which suggests that it could grow by 16.59%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.292% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.803%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Flowserve offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M is higher than Flowserve's net income of $58.4M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.97x while Flowserve's PE ratio is 29.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.19x versus 1.72x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graham has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 6.13%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73% beat Graham's return on equity of 7.3%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $738.41, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Graham has an analysts' consensus of $52.17 which suggests that it could grow by 20.78%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.292% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.227%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Graham offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Graham pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Graham quarterly revenues of $53.6M. Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M is higher than Graham's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.97x while Graham's PE ratio is 60.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.19x versus 2.41x for Graham. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 11.91%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.43%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $738.41, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Ingersoll Rand has an analysts' consensus of $106.01 which suggests that it could grow by 18.81%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.292% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.438, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.804%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Ingersoll Rand offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 4.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M is higher than Ingersoll Rand's net income of $221.6M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.97x while Ingersoll Rand's PE ratio is 43.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.19x versus 5.08x for Ingersoll Rand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 10.31%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.1%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $738.41, signalling upside risk potential of 15.11%. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $146.95 which suggests that it could grow by 26.78%. Given that Xylem has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Xylem is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.292% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.481%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M is higher than Xylem's net income of $217M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.97x while Xylem's PE ratio is 33.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.19x versus 3.35x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.