SWK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kennametal has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 3.72%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $99.52, signalling upside risk potential of 53.92%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.46%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Kennametal.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.554, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.414%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.06%. Kennametal offers a yield of 4.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker's is not.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $482.1M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $17.9M. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.33x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 16.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.64x versus 0.77x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liquidmetal Technologies has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of -384.5%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33% beat Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -5.03%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $99.52, signalling upside risk potential of 53.92%. On the other hand Liquidmetal Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1900%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Stanley Black & Decker, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Stanley Black & Decker.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.761%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.06%. Liquidmetal Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Liquidmetal Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues of $129K. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M is higher than Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$496K. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.33x while Liquidmetal Technologies's PE ratio is 100,000.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.64x versus 106.66x for Liquidmetal Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of -0.33%. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.43%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $99.52, signalling upside risk potential of 53.92%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of $44.33 which suggests that it could grow by 33.25%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Proto Labs.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.383%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.06%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $121.8M. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M is higher than Proto Labs's net income of -$404K. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.33x while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 51.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.64x versus 1.68x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International has a net margin of 5.24% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of --. Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 3.33% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.

Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $99.52, signalling upside risk potential of 53.92%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5354.55%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Stanley Black & Decker, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Stanley Black & Decker.

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.138, which suggesting that the stock is 13.848% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.63%.

Stanley Black & Decker has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.06%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stanley Black & Decker pays 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $194.9M is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, Stanley Black & Decker's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.33x while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stanley Black & Decker is 0.64x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.