FTNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cloudflare has a net margin of 31.7% compared to Fortinet's net margin of -2.79%. Fortinet's return on equity of 417.67% beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -8.83%.

Fortinet has a consensus price target of $113.51, signalling upside risk potential of 18.16%. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $139.49 which suggests that it could grow by 27.33%. Given that Cloudflare has higher upside potential than Fortinet, analysts believe Cloudflare is more attractive than Fortinet.

Fortinet has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.303%.

Fortinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortinet quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $459.9M. Fortinet's net income of $526.2M is higher than Cloudflare's net income of -$12.8M. Notably, Fortinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.51x while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortinet is 12.45x versus 22.40x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of 31.7% compared to Fortinet's net margin of 3.37%. Fortinet's return on equity of 417.67% beat Okta's return on equity of 0.46%.

Fortinet has a consensus price target of $113.51, signalling upside risk potential of 18.16%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $117.24 which suggests that it could grow by 17.27%. Given that Fortinet has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Fortinet is more attractive than Okta.

Fortinet has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.826%.

Fortinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortinet quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Okta quarterly revenues of $682M. Fortinet's net income of $526.2M is higher than Okta's net income of $23M. Notably, Fortinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.51x while Okta's PE ratio is 2,499.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortinet is 12.45x versus 6.74x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 31.7% compared to Fortinet's net margin of 11.84%. Fortinet's return on equity of 417.67% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87%.

Fortinet has a consensus price target of $113.51, signalling upside risk potential of 18.16%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $211.98 which suggests that it could grow by 24.96%. Given that Palo Alto Networks has higher upside potential than Fortinet, analysts believe Palo Alto Networks is more attractive than Fortinet.

Fortinet has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.483%.

Fortinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortinet quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Fortinet's net income of $526.2M is higher than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M. Notably, Fortinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.51x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 95.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortinet is 12.45x versus 14.04x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 31.7% compared to Fortinet's net margin of 9.55%. Fortinet's return on equity of 417.67% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 10.88%.

Fortinet has a consensus price target of $113.51, signalling upside risk potential of 18.16%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $87.05 which suggests that it could fall by -6.11%. Given that Fortinet has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe Fortinet is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

Fortinet has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.456% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fortinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortinet quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $827.5M. Fortinet's net income of $526.2M is higher than Palantir Technologies's net income of $79M. Notably, Fortinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.51x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 487.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortinet is 12.45x versus 79.29x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.