FTNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 35.8% compared to Fortinet's net margin of -1.67%. Fortinet's return on equity of 1142.57% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of 4.89%.

Fortinet has a consensus price target of $97.02, signalling downside risk potential of -0.47%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $377.35 which suggests that it could grow by 5.11%. Given that CrowdStrike Holdings has higher upside potential than Fortinet, analysts believe CrowdStrike Holdings is more attractive than Fortinet.

Fortinet has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.614%.

Fortinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortinet quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Fortinet's net income of $539.9M is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$16.8M. Notably, Fortinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.23x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 703.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortinet is 13.16x versus 23.87x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 35.8% compared to Fortinet's net margin of 16.4%. Fortinet's return on equity of 1142.57% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 61.92%.

Fortinet has a consensus price target of $97.02, signalling downside risk potential of -0.47%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $204.56 which suggests that it could grow by 11.63%. Given that Palo Alto Networks has higher upside potential than Fortinet, analysts believe Palo Alto Networks is more attractive than Fortinet.

Fortinet has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.925%.

Fortinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortinet quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Fortinet's net income of $539.9M is higher than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $350.7M. Notably, Fortinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.23x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 47.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortinet is 13.16x versus 15.70x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verify Smart has a net margin of 35.8% compared to Fortinet's net margin of --. Fortinet's return on equity of 1142.57% beat Verify Smart's return on equity of --.

Fortinet has a consensus price target of $97.02, signalling downside risk potential of -0.47%. On the other hand Verify Smart has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortinet has higher upside potential than Verify Smart, analysts believe Fortinet is more attractive than Verify Smart.

Fortinet has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verify Smart has a beta of 3.581, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 258.143%.

Fortinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verify Smart offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verify Smart pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortinet quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Verify Smart quarterly revenues of --. Fortinet's net income of $539.9M is higher than Verify Smart's net income of --. Notably, Fortinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.23x while Verify Smart's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortinet is 13.16x versus -- for Verify Smart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zscaler has a net margin of 35.8% compared to Fortinet's net margin of -1.92%. Fortinet's return on equity of 1142.57% beat Zscaler's return on equity of -3.26%.

Fortinet has a consensus price target of $97.02, signalling downside risk potential of -0.47%. On the other hand Zscaler has an analysts' consensus of $226.21 which suggests that it could grow by 21.49%. Given that Zscaler has higher upside potential than Fortinet, analysts believe Zscaler is more attractive than Fortinet.

Fortinet has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.247% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zscaler has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.459%.

Fortinet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zscaler offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortinet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zscaler pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fortinet quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Zscaler quarterly revenues of $628M. Fortinet's net income of $539.9M is higher than Zscaler's net income of -$12.1M. Notably, Fortinet's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.23x while Zscaler's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortinet is 13.16x versus 12.27x for Zscaler. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.