PANW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intuit has a net margin of 16.4% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 6%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 61.92% beat Intuit's return on equity of 16.36%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $203.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.13%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $728.08 which suggests that it could grow by 16.46%. Given that Intuit has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Intuit is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.139, which suggesting that the stock is 13.925% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.247, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.659%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $350.7M is higher than Intuit's net income of $197M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.74x while Intuit's PE ratio is 60.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 15.38x versus 10.69x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ServiceNow has a net margin of 16.4% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 15.45%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 61.92% beat ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.34%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $203.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.13%. On the other hand ServiceNow has an analysts' consensus of $1,071.37 which suggests that it could fall by -0.53%. Given that Palo Alto Networks has higher upside potential than ServiceNow, analysts believe Palo Alto Networks is more attractive than ServiceNow.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.139, which suggesting that the stock is 13.925% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ServiceNow has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.374%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ServiceNow offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ServiceNow pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than ServiceNow quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $350.7M is lower than ServiceNow's net income of $432M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.74x while ServiceNow's PE ratio is 167.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 15.38x versus 21.38x for ServiceNow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of 16.4% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 6.08%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 61.92% beat ePlus's return on equity of 12.01%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $203.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.13%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.22%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.139, which suggesting that the stock is 13.925% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.534%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than ePlus quarterly revenues of $515.2M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $350.7M is higher than ePlus's net income of $31.3M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.74x while ePlus's PE ratio is 18.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 15.38x versus 0.94x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 16.4% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of -4.06%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 61.92% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -16.46%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $203.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.13%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $48.51 which suggests that it could grow by 20.77%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.139, which suggesting that the stock is 13.925% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.852, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.754%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $227.1M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $350.7M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of -$9.2M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.74x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 15.38x versus 5.40x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.