PLUS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 4.72% compared to ePlus's net margin of 11.84%. ePlus's return on equity of 11.36% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of $77.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.46%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $211.90 which suggests that it could grow by 18.39%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

ePlus has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.075, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.483%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $511M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. ePlus's net income of $24.1M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 100.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.79x versus 14.80x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 4.72% compared to ePlus's net margin of 4.41%. ePlus's return on equity of 11.36% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 8.03%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of $77.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.46%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.32%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than ePlus.

ePlus has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.262%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $511M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.6M. ePlus's net income of $24.1M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $863K. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 73.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.79x versus 7.00x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 4.72% compared to ePlus's net margin of 0.79%. ePlus's return on equity of 11.36% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -9.69%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of $77.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.46%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $45.80 which suggests that it could grow by 38.87%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than ePlus.

ePlus has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.462%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $511M, which are larger than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $235.7M. ePlus's net income of $24.1M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of $1.9M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.79x versus 4.35x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 4.72% compared to ePlus's net margin of -5.04%. ePlus's return on equity of 11.36% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -76.42%.

ePlus has a consensus price target of $77.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.46%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 80.85%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than ePlus.

ePlus has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.524% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.848%.

ePlus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ePlus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ePlus quarterly revenues are $511M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $68M. ePlus's net income of $24.1M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, ePlus's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ePlus is 0.79x versus 0.24x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.