TENB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus has a net margin of -9.59% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 4.72%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.05, signalling upside risk potential of 19.02%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.03%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.833, which suggesting that the stock is 16.678% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.143%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.1M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M is lower than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ePlus's PE ratio is 16.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.03x versus 0.79x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of -9.59% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 4.41%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 8.03%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.05, signalling upside risk potential of 19.02%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.22%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than Red Violet.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.833, which suggesting that the stock is 16.678% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.18%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.1M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.6M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M is lower than Red Violet's net income of $863K. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Violet's PE ratio is 77.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.03x versus 7.43x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of -9.59% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of -5.04%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -76.42%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.05, signalling upside risk potential of 19.02%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 81.62%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.833, which suggesting that the stock is 16.678% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.856%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.1M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $68M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M is lower than Upland Software's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.03x versus 0.24x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WEX has a net margin of -9.59% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 11.23%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74% beat WEX's return on equity of 20.91%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.05, signalling upside risk potential of 19.02%. On the other hand WEX has an analysts' consensus of $154.99 which suggests that it could grow by 26.69%. Given that WEX has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe WEX is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.833, which suggesting that the stock is 16.678% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WEX has a beta of 1.261, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.067%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WEX offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WEX pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.1M, which are smaller than WEX quarterly revenues of $636.6M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M is lower than WEX's net income of $71.5M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WEX's PE ratio is 15.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.03x versus 1.90x for WEX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.