TENB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Markforged Holding has a net margin of -4.06% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of -114.09%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -16.46% beat Markforged Holding's return on equity of -65.07%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $48.51, signalling upside risk potential of 24.49%. On the other hand Markforged Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.63%. Given that Markforged Holding has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe Markforged Holding is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Markforged Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Markforged Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Markforged Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $227.1M, which are larger than Markforged Holding quarterly revenues of $20.5M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$9.2M is higher than Markforged Holding's net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Markforged Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 5.24x versus 0.79x for Markforged Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of -4.06% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 16.4%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -16.46% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 61.92%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $48.51, signalling upside risk potential of 24.49%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $203.08 which suggests that it could grow by 15.71%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.139, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.925%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $227.1M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$9.2M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $350.7M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 45.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 5.24x versus 15.04x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of -4.06% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 6.08%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -16.46% beat ePlus's return on equity of 12.01%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $48.51, signalling upside risk potential of 24.49%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.25%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than ePlus.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.534%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $227.1M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $515.2M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$9.2M is lower than ePlus's net income of $31.3M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ePlus's PE ratio is 18.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 5.24x versus 0.94x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of -4.06% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of -2.6%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -16.46% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -69.75%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $48.51, signalling upside risk potential of 24.49%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -32.83%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than Upland Software, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than Upland Software.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.852, which suggesting that the stock is 14.754% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.538%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $227.1M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$9.2M is lower than Upland Software's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 5.24x versus 0.47x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.