RDVT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Red Violet's net margin of 11.84%. Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87%.

Red Violet has a consensus price target of $52.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.06%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $211.20 which suggests that it could grow by 10%. Given that Palo Alto Networks has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe Palo Alto Networks is more attractive than Red Violet.

Red Violet has a beta of 1.692, which suggesting that the stock is 69.18% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.467%.

Red Violet has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Violet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Violet quarterly revenues are $22M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Red Violet's net income of $3.4M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M. Notably, Red Violet's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.90x while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 108.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Violet is 8.49x versus 15.88x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Red Violet's net margin of 4.72%. Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

Red Violet has a consensus price target of $52.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.06%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.1%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Red Violet.

Red Violet has a beta of 1.692, which suggesting that the stock is 69.18% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.143%.

Red Violet has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Violet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Violet quarterly revenues are $22M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. Red Violet's net income of $3.4M is lower than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Red Violet's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.90x while ePlus's PE ratio is 17.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Violet is 8.49x versus 0.84x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Red Violet's net margin of -9.59%. Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74%.

Red Violet has a consensus price target of $52.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.06%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.05 which suggests that it could grow by 10.63%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than Red Violet.

Red Violet has a beta of 1.692, which suggesting that the stock is 69.18% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.678%.

Red Violet has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Violet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Violet quarterly revenues are $22M, which are smaller than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $239.1M. Red Violet's net income of $3.4M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M. Notably, Red Violet's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.90x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Violet is 8.49x versus 4.33x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 15.63% compared to Red Violet's net margin of -5.04%. Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -76.42%.

Red Violet has a consensus price target of $52.00, signalling upside risk potential of 9.06%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 54.55%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than Red Violet.

Red Violet has a beta of 1.692, which suggesting that the stock is 69.18% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.856%.

Red Violet has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Violet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Violet quarterly revenues are $22M, which are smaller than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $68M. Red Violet's net income of $3.4M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Red Violet's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.90x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Violet is 8.49x versus 0.28x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.