IIIV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus has a net margin of 3.33% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 4.72%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 27.8% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $31.71, signalling upside risk potential of 17.9%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.63%. Given that i3 Verticals has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe i3 Verticals is more attractive than ePlus.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.143%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. i3 Verticals's net income of $2.1M is lower than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.99x while ePlus's PE ratio is 16.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.59x versus 0.82x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 3.33% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 4.41%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 27.8% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 8.03%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $31.71, signalling upside risk potential of 17.9%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.54%. Given that i3 Verticals has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe i3 Verticals is more attractive than Red Violet.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.692, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.18%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.6M. i3 Verticals's net income of $2.1M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $863K. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.99x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 91.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.59x versus 8.75x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 3.33% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of -9.59%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 27.8% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $31.71, signalling upside risk potential of 17.9%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.05 which suggests that it could grow by 15.75%. Given that i3 Verticals has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe i3 Verticals is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.678%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are smaller than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $239.1M. i3 Verticals's net income of $2.1M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.99x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.59x versus 4.14x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 3.33% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of -5.04%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 27.8% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -76.42%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $31.71, signalling upside risk potential of 17.9%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 74.9%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.306, which suggesting that the stock is 30.575% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.269, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.856%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are smaller than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $68M. i3 Verticals's net income of $2.1M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.99x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.59x versus 0.25x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.