RLGT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a net margin of 2.45% compared to Radiant Logistics's net margin of 3.57%. Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 6.63% beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 30.16%.

Radiant Logistics has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand C.H. Robinson Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $112.17 which suggests that it could grow by 21.89%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.749% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.385%.

Radiant Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Radiant Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 63.3% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues are $264.5M, which are smaller than C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Radiant Logistics's net income of $6.5M is lower than C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $149.3M. Notably, Radiant Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while C.H. Robinson Worldwide's PE ratio is 23.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics is 0.34x versus 0.63x for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forward Air has a net margin of 2.45% compared to Radiant Logistics's net margin of -5.75%. Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 6.63% beat Forward Air's return on equity of -132.48%.

Radiant Logistics has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand Forward Air has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 103.96%. Given that Forward Air has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Forward Air is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.749% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.007%.

Radiant Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forward Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Radiant Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues are $264.5M, which are smaller than Forward Air quarterly revenues of $632.8M. Radiant Logistics's net income of $6.5M is higher than Forward Air's net income of -$36.4M. Notably, Radiant Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Forward Air's PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics is 0.34x versus 0.18x for Forward Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group has a net margin of 2.45% compared to Radiant Logistics's net margin of 2.5%. Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 6.63% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.33%.

Radiant Logistics has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $42.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.52%. Given that Radiant Logistics has higher upside potential than Hub Group, analysts believe Radiant Logistics is more attractive than Hub Group.

Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.749% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.428%.

Radiant Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Radiant Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out 29.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues are $264.5M, which are smaller than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $973.5M. Radiant Logistics's net income of $6.5M is lower than Hub Group's net income of $24.4M. Notably, Radiant Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Hub Group's PE ratio is 19.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics is 0.34x versus 0.52x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Singularity Future Technology has a net margin of 2.45% compared to Radiant Logistics's net margin of -69.07%. Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 6.63% beat Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -26.26%.

Radiant Logistics has a consensus price target of $9.50, signalling upside risk potential of 56.25%. On the other hand Singularity Future Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1161.72%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.749% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.776, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.609%.

Radiant Logistics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Singularity Future Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Radiant Logistics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Singularity Future Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues are $264.5M, which are larger than Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues of $474.6K. Radiant Logistics's net income of $6.5M is higher than Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$327.8K. Notably, Radiant Logistics's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Singularity Future Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radiant Logistics is 0.34x versus 1.04x for Singularity Future Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.