DIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a net margin of 2.53% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of -13.92%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of --.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $29.86, signalling upside risk potential of 51.71%. On the other hand Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has an analysts' consensus of $9.25 which suggests that it could grow by 202.29%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Dine Brands Global, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Dine Brands Global.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.437, which suggesting that the stock is 43.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 147.213%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.37%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $204.8M, which are smaller than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues of $285.2M. Dine Brands Global's net income of $5.2M is higher than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of -$39.7M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.67x while Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.36x versus 0.04x for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 2.53% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 8.06%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 34.11%.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $29.86, signalling upside risk potential of 51.71%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $189.84 which suggests that it could grow by 18.53%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.437, which suggesting that the stock is 43.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.222%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.37%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $204.8M, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Dine Brands Global's net income of $5.2M is lower than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $115.8M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.67x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 24.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.36x versus 2.00x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wendy's has a net margin of 2.53% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 8.27%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat The Wendy's's return on equity of 69.59%.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $29.86, signalling upside risk potential of 51.71%. On the other hand The Wendy's has an analysts' consensus of $17.30 which suggests that it could grow by 35.26%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than The Wendy's, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than The Wendy's.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.437, which suggesting that the stock is 43.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wendy's has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.907%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.37%. The Wendy's offers a yield of 7.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wendy's pays out 105.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Wendy's's is not.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $204.8M, which are smaller than The Wendy's quarterly revenues of $574.3M. Dine Brands Global's net income of $5.2M is lower than The Wendy's's net income of $47.5M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.67x while The Wendy's's PE ratio is 13.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.36x versus 1.17x for The Wendy's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 2.53% compared to Dine Brands Global's net margin of 17.91%. Dine Brands Global's return on equity of -- beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Dine Brands Global has a consensus price target of $29.86, signalling upside risk potential of 51.71%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $155.83 which suggests that it could grow by 7.47%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Yum Brands.

Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.437, which suggesting that the stock is 43.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 0.895, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.487%.

Dine Brands Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.37%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Dine Brands Global pays 48.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues are $204.8M, which are smaller than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Dine Brands Global's net income of $5.2M is lower than Yum Brands's net income of $423M. Notably, Dine Brands Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.67x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 27.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dine Brands Global is 0.36x versus 5.48x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.