LPX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Builders FirstSource has a net margin of 12.47% compared to Louisiana-Pacific's net margin of 6.73%. Louisiana-Pacific's return on equity of 26.06% beat Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 26.9%.

Louisiana-Pacific has a consensus price target of $111.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.65%. On the other hand Builders FirstSource has an analysts' consensus of $204.17 which suggests that it could grow by 42.28%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than Louisiana-Pacific, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than Louisiana-Pacific.

Louisiana-Pacific has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.184% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Builders FirstSource has a beta of 2.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.415%.

Louisiana-Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Builders FirstSource offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Louisiana-Pacific pays 38.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Builders FirstSource pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Louisiana-Pacific's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Louisiana-Pacific quarterly revenues are $722M, which are smaller than Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Louisiana-Pacific's net income of $90M is lower than Builders FirstSource's net income of $284.8M. Notably, Louisiana-Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.37x while Builders FirstSource's PE ratio is 14.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Louisiana-Pacific is 2.62x versus 1.04x for Builders FirstSource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cummins has a net margin of 12.47% compared to Louisiana-Pacific's net margin of 9.57%. Louisiana-Pacific's return on equity of 26.06% beat Cummins's return on equity of 19.56%.

Louisiana-Pacific has a consensus price target of $111.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.65%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $380.48 which suggests that it could grow by 5.76%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Louisiana-Pacific, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Louisiana-Pacific.

Louisiana-Pacific has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.184% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.96400000000001%.

Louisiana-Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Cummins offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Louisiana-Pacific pays 38.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Louisiana-Pacific's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cummins's is not.

Louisiana-Pacific quarterly revenues are $722M, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Louisiana-Pacific's net income of $90M is lower than Cummins's net income of $809M. Notably, Louisiana-Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.37x while Cummins's PE ratio is 23.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Louisiana-Pacific is 2.62x versus 1.48x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Emerson Electric has a net margin of 12.47% compared to Louisiana-Pacific's net margin of 21.56%. Louisiana-Pacific's return on equity of 26.06% beat Emerson Electric's return on equity of 7.34%.

Louisiana-Pacific has a consensus price target of $111.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.65%. On the other hand Emerson Electric has an analysts' consensus of $140.08 which suggests that it could grow by 16.44%. Given that Emerson Electric has higher upside potential than Louisiana-Pacific, analysts believe Emerson Electric is more attractive than Louisiana-Pacific.

Louisiana-Pacific has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.184% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.348, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.814%.

Louisiana-Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Emerson Electric offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Louisiana-Pacific pays 38.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric pays out 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Louisiana-Pacific quarterly revenues are $722M, which are smaller than Emerson Electric quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Louisiana-Pacific's net income of $90M is lower than Emerson Electric's net income of $996M. Notably, Louisiana-Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.37x while Emerson Electric's PE ratio is 35.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Louisiana-Pacific is 2.62x versus 3.95x for Emerson Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 12.47% compared to Louisiana-Pacific's net margin of 15.95%. Louisiana-Pacific's return on equity of 26.06% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 175.69%.

Louisiana-Pacific has a consensus price target of $111.50, signalling upside risk potential of 4.65%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $622.71 which suggests that it could fall by -0.46%. Given that Louisiana-Pacific has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Louisiana-Pacific is more attractive than Lennox International.

Louisiana-Pacific has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.184% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.697%.

Louisiana-Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Louisiana-Pacific pays 38.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Louisiana-Pacific quarterly revenues are $722M, which are smaller than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Louisiana-Pacific's net income of $90M is lower than Lennox International's net income of $239M. Notably, Louisiana-Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.37x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 29.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Louisiana-Pacific is 2.62x versus 4.35x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.